[maccawozzagod]

I think the point that Nickelson was making Redskin was that if one man owns a controlling share he can, if he wishes, veto any decision and make his own decisions on how ASFC progresses. These decisions are sometimes good, and they are sometimes bad.

If ASSF had a controlling share it would, at worst, have 12 committee members voting on good or bad decisions, and at worst would have hundreds. It would also be more accomodating to individual professional opinions on things regardless of what we wanted. If the accountant says no to a wage rise to Kenny Arthur then that decision would have been made with the head rather than the heart.

The Don, or Eric, or anybody else may have made an emotional decision and paid the extra - as with Paul Mullin for example.