Re: ASSF response to The Dons programme notes ...
I think that is what’s saddening out this episode, I have stated else ware that the fact that O’Neil as put in is own money up now (around £250k I understand) so it’s only right that if the ASSF wants’ control then at least it would show respect and acknowledgement of his previous commitment from the ASSF/Khan camp; he would be an idiot to walk away and abandon that level of investment…I don’t think Mr. Khan will have made his money by doing such things.
What we need is leadership; if the ASSF wants to control Accrington Stanley then it should at least show some common since and allow O’Neil to withdraw with some financial settlement; it would be cheaper for him to let the club die rather than gift it to the ASSF.
That said any reluctance or inability to further invest in the club should be seen as a negative position and there for untenable in the eyes of those currently bailing out the club…………..The Public.
If the ASSF is to be seen as impartial then their must be an irreversible withdrawal of Mr. Khan from the cause, unfortunately that would mean the ASSF is penniless to help anyone.
If Mr. Khan was to purchase 25% Mr. O’Neil’s holding and then gives an equal share to the ASSF and each party was then to pay off the short fall with an equal donation we would have a working consensus.
Alternatively stop messing about and buy the club Mr. Khan and then turn it into a business in partnership with the people.
On Stanley On.
__________________
On - Stanley – On - Who’s Laughing Now -
Last edited by Stanleymad; 28-09-2009 at 19:39.
Reason: asterix's family forum
|