View Single Post
Old 05-10-2009, 19:40   #52
Jesus_was_A_red_
Full Member
 
Jesus_was_A_red_'s Avatar
 

Re: Dave O'Neil statement

Quote:
Originally Posted by caretaker View Post
I am starting to get the impression that even if David Oniel was to pay off Whalleys tax bill, pay the players wages out of his own pocket, put a new roof on the away stand, and give away free pie and peas to the home fans,he still would not be liked(can this be true)?
Very unlikely outcome if we are to be realists. Stanley wouldnt be in the position we are in if he had money to do these things. Why did he take on EWS tax bill with no way of paying it off other than making people go begging on behalf of a debt he has purchased?

Ive nothing against the guy personally other than he his obviously not the right man to run a football club. The way he has conducted himself is disgraceful. He has made a wrong financial decision in taking over Stanley with no financial clout, the clubs mounting debts and all the other things that are likely to be exposed he is out of his depth and beggers the question why the hell has he put himself in this position ? I think he is unlikely to get business deal of the year award anyway.
Does anyone know how much he paid for the club or was it a case of buying the debt as it outweighs the value. Ilyas Khans fears have proved he was right before the don took over so I am 99.9% sure he is right now also. Its public knowledge now that an offer has been on the table yet the directors want the people of lancashire to pay it off rather than having shares diluted. The sympathy is already non-existent outside. You cant fool everyone well not me anyway. I wish for a rosey outcome but all i can see it at the very best is debts to pay off debts to buy a little more time.
Jesus_was_A_red_ is offline   Reply With Quote