Quote:
Originally Posted by Fatso
I think the key point here is whether or not the statement cited above is the genuinely held belief of those who said it, and that they really would rather have no club (and no investment) than have someone they disapprove of in charge, or rather if it's just bluff and bluster; fighting talk if you will.
If it's the former, then it will not just be them that lose their investments, but everyone else who is a shareholder. And, most importantly, there will be no Stanley.
|
The A.S.S.F. Believe very strongly that this was not a bluff of any sort!
Just another angle, we must wonder why Peter Marsden felt he had to stand down???
Accrington Stanley Football Club Limited
Sunday 4th Oct 2009
Vice Chairman stands down
Accrington Stanley vice chairman Peter Marsden has today resigned as a director of Accrington Stanley.
Speaking about his decision Peter explained "Personally I think the main protagonists involved in the off-field war of words afflicting our club should be locked in a room and not let out until they have resolved their differences.
"If required I would be happy to act as a mediator - not as a director but as an independent shareholder -
but you can only help people if they want to be helped.
Food for thought?????
