Accrington Web - View Single Post

Whalley Red · 28-10-2009, 20:11

If the £100k was from the directors, that would leave a shortfall of just £12k once the PFA money had been received ... clearly this is not the case. Ilyas has been talking about guaranteeing the shortfall of £112k.

Note that even though the the news agency story which appears on several news sites states that the directors are putting in £100k, this are not the words on the fishy site and nor are these the words that Rob Heys says in either the 2br or the Radio Lancashire interview.

Clearly, the directors/O'Neill/Heys haven't put in very much, if at all, and not the £100k that was promised several weeks ago. Maybe, they'd rather see the club go under than lose their own money

In terms of the PFA, they paid at least half of the players wages last month. Not sure about this month.

I'm sure it will be a loan from the PFA.

28-10-2009, 20:11	#98
Whalley Red Full Member+ Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 668 Liked: 82 times Rep Power: 1650	Re: Court case for Accrington Stanley If the £100k was from the directors, that would leave a shortfall of just £12k once the PFA money had been received ... clearly this is not the case. Ilyas has been talking about guaranteeing the shortfall of £112k. Note that even though the the news agency story which appears on several news sites states that the directors are putting in £100k, this are not the words on the fishy site and nor are these the words that Rob Heys says in either the 2br or the Radio Lancashire interview. Clearly, the directors/O'Neill/Heys haven't put in very much, if at all, and not the £100k that was promised several weeks ago. Maybe, they'd rather see the club go under than lose their own money In terms of the PFA, they paid at least half of the players wages last month. Not sure about this month. I'm sure it will be a loan from the PFA.