|
Re: Rob Heys
I had Mr Khan's post in mind when reading the Accrington Observer today. Reading with a different perspective you get the feeling that in quotes such as "Mr Khan's presence certainly offered weight to our argument in the courtroom" (which as first made me red in the face), Rob is reluctantly speaking on behalf of the company and therefore his boss; a boss in 'damage limitation to image and power' mode. David needs Rob, Rob needs Accrington Stanley. I don't know whether Rob would make a good chief executive as he's never really had that role (it's always been the owner of the majority of shares making the decisions) but as was said a few weeks ago, we all know he'll be around for better or worse in years to come, busting a gut for the club.
|