02-12-2009, 21:16
|
#67
|
Coffin Dodger.
|
Re: Hacker loses extradition battle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guinness
Ok, my last plea, then the defence rests...
FACT...The government that claims this guy is a cyber terrorist and did all this damage is the same government that claimed that saddam hussein had weapons of mass destruction.not relavant
FACT....The judicial system that he will be tried under is the same one that allowed miscarriages of justice so that OJ Simpson and Michael Jackson could play their get out of jail free cards, yet still holds people in Guantanemo Bay without trial.without doubt but irrelavant
FACT...The alleged crime was carried out in this country not in the US.The crime was against the U.S.
FACT...And finally..regardless of what you believe to be the truth about the case... we have a biased extradition treaty, and that the current labour home secretary describes this bias as 'academic'. it is a biased treaty, has the guy commited a crime or not, cos thats the rules right or not.
Airstrip One looms ever closer.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guinness
I have the right to rebut stupid remarks.
We have the right to debate and disagree, my interpretation may disagree with yours, but I do not post something as fact without being certain of what I post.
Your buddy jumped and fell on his face by not even being aware of the timeframe of this case.
Spuggie and yourself tried to score cheap shots, which judging from what i've read on this forum is beneath both of you, and you both now have egg on your face.
A simple apology would have been nice, instead I get another cheap shot. You are so much better than this Cashman..I'm disappointed
|
the facts you speak only of quoting are not valid cos they are not relavant. its you that are trying to take people fer dummies for quoting em. its you who should apologise fer taking people as stupid.
__________________
N.L.T.B.G.Y.D. Do not argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
|
|
|