Quote:
Originally Posted by cashman
the question andrew,is a non question in my book, the "Whole" point is simple, its a waste of public money, simple as that. the fact you are too slow to see it is not my fault.  i would still say the same if the boot were on the other foot n labour held majority in town n they did it, summat thats well beyond you. |
Agree it's a waste. Have said that for some time cashy. You're choosing to ignore the below though which helps to illustrate my point. It's a waste of money but at least to some people it will be valuable. It's less valuable or useful to those people because it lacks some of the councillors contact details.
It is like saying which is more of a waste, the council flushing £500 down the loo, or the council giving Oswaldtwistle calendars for £500? Obviously flushing it down the loo isn't much use to anybody, the calendars will be useful to
some people. Same monetary cost, but one is more wasteful than the other.
If I give you a piece of paper with some councillors contact details on but not others, and a piece of paper with all the councillors on. I produced them at roughly the same cost - which one is more useful to you?