Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewb
Things have value.
If you print £500 worth of calendars with some councillors details on, and then you print £500 worth of calendars with all the councillors details on, then the second one is going to be more valuable to residents.
In either case it's the same monetary waste of £500, which should never have been wasted in the first place and well done to Labour for opposing said waste.
They knew however that a calendar was being produced. Of the two calendars mentioned earlier, they caused the first one to be produced by refusing to be included on them, which had less value to residents.
Spending £500 and producing something that is less valuable than it could be, means both parties are to blame here. The Tories for spending the money and Labour for making the calendar less valuable and useful to residents.
|
Ain't it marvelous that Rindi and friends drone on about a £500 calendar, yet are quite happy to stay silent about billions of pounds worth of debt this poxy government have saddled use with, I've notices not too man of the elected left and their sycophants have anything to say about this unmitigated disaster inflicted on this country, and yet the borrowing still goes on and on and on. Only this morning Its been reported that if Gordon hadn't sold our gold stocks off at rock bottom prices we would have been £10 million better of, mind you when you have a government borrowing around £20 billion every month, £10 billion is peanuts in the real scheme of things