View Single Post
Old 14-01-2010, 09:33   #35
Stephen666
Full Member
 
Stephen666's Avatar
 

Re: whalley to return?

"Finally, on the shares. The equity has been for some time and will continue to be for some time to come, almost irrelevant in terms of control. Our club has large costs and requires massive further investment, and unless and until an equity shareholder has the wherewithal and committment to stump up that cash, he or she has no practical say."

Quote from Ilyas's post earlier.


"Surely, if he is stil the majority share holder (52%) he still has overall control of the club." . . . . . . . He only owns shares, he is not the Chairman or the Director and he is hardly in a financial position to start throwing money Stanley's way.
So - at the moment - it's not a problem.

If an investor came forward and started to throw millions in stanley's direction then the investor would want as many shares as possible so when the club value rose his shares would rise too and so he would see some financial benifit.

So at the moment he can keep them . . . . . . Unles he wants to sell them to me . . . . Mr Whalley, if you read this forum PM me with a price, I will buy the shares from you.
__________________
“I’ve lost count of the number of occasions I flew in from Hong Kong, went to a game and just flew back again" - Ilyas Khan

Hey you, don't watch that watch this! This is the heavy heavy monster sound,
The nuttiest sound around. So if you've come in off the street and you're beginning to feel the heat,
Well listen buster, you better start to move your feet to the rockinest, rock-steady beat of STANLEY


SOS 243

Last edited by Stephen666; 14-01-2010 at 09:36. Reason: can't spell
Stephen666 is offline   Reply With Quote