Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewb
Yep, pedantic. You're not interested in discussing the issue, not interested in discussing whether you agree or disagree with what I posted. Only interested in pointless replies which serve nothing to the subject but merely try and undermine the poster without actually addressing the issue.
You'd be a good politician. You still haven't managed to come out with an opinion on what I picked up from the newspaper which nobody has yet addressed in the thread.
Very easy to sit on the fence and criticise the spelling of others, the choice of posters words, or simply criticise somebodies ability to think. You don't seem to provide a counter argument or even agreement though. Speaks volumes.
|
My comments relate to the fact that it's taken you over a week to absorb information reported in the press, and given in a link by myself, about your own party's policies, which relates to the subject of this thread, and even now you only 'think' you know what's going on.
The fact was that anyone interested enough was able to read what was written in the the article in Times, and you apparently have only just seen it, is quite funny.
The fact that the Conservatives are to impose all-women shortlists on constituencies which have a M.P. who announce they're standing down after January, might be irrelevant to Hyndburn.
That still doesn't address the issue of the widely reported power struggle between the local Conservative association, and the more caring, sharing, hug-a-hoodie, national Conservative party.
They don't seem very happy with the preferred candidate list of the local party, a motley crew of councillors, including an already twice defeated rejectee of previous General Elections in Hyndburn.
As a non-partisan member of the electorate here in Hyndburn I look forward to seeing who eventually wins the power struggle, when the candidate is eventually announced.