Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewb
Yep, pedantic. You're not interested in discussing the issue, not interested in discussing whether you agree or disagree with what I posted. Only interested in pointless replies which serve nothing to the subject but merely try and undermine the poster without actually addressing the issue.
You'd be a good politician. You still haven't managed to come out with an opinion on what I picked up from the newspaper which nobody has yet addressed in the thread.
Very easy to sit on the fence and criticise the spelling of others, the choice of posters words, or simply criticise somebodies ability to think. You don't seem to provide a counter argument or even agreement though. Speaks volumes.
|
By he way, I have never criticised your spelling, in this or other threads. So it's a bit weak to play the poor victim card.
Though, through humour (whoosh, right over your head), I did disagree with your choice of words, because in my opinion my posts were neither pedantic, or a rant.
My comments were those of amazement, based on the fact that you chose to reignite this thread, bringing no new information, other than you thought you now 'knew' something to be incorrect, gathered from information other people had already understood and digested.
I've never ranted on here, as it would be too much effort, and I'd rather save that effort and energy to spend in more challenging debates, in places other than Accy Web.