Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewb
Does it? I can't think of any examples where government has been more accountable under two elected chambers. The British system with one elected chamber holding all the power, is far more accountable, as the public can throw out a government. Not that there is or should be a one size fits all solution.
I hope the paragraph is clearer now.
|
but can you name any name any other democracy (in what we call "the west") that has hereditary Lords changing and sometimes refusing laws imposed by an elected government... no one is born to impose laws (by the way, you would do a good job as the sheriff of Nottingham)