|
Re: Unions flexing their muscles again
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrie Yates
I must point out that in the '50s it was necessary to be a Trade Union member - if you weren't then you didn't get a job.
|
Though this changed after 1964, because of the ruling after the Rookes vs. Barnard case.
Before that of course, if you were vehemently opposed to becoming a union member, in those halcyon days of full employment, you could have picked a line of work that didn't require union membership.
__________________
'If you're going to be a Kant, be the very best Kant there is my son.'
Johann Georg Kant, father of Immanuel Kant, philosopher.
|