Re: Conservative candidate named.
If people wish to cement their relationship by marriage, they should be afforded that choice, regardless of anything else.
What religions preach and practice, should be subject to the same laws governing every other body in the country.
Some faiths have their own laws, which can result in executions, maiming, amputations, and stonings, for those guilty of crimes against religion. In a civilised democracy these religious freedoms of expression are rightfully made illegal, by the laws that govern us as a whole.
Another question I'd like to ask Ms. Buckley, when she hopefully calls, is if she'd already been the M.P. for Hyndburn, given a free vote, would she have voted in favour of an equal age of consent? Which after years of injustice, when 21 and 20 year olds in a consensual relationship, were imprisoned because they happpened to be of the same gender, and which thankfully this government has now legislated against, and gender parity now exists in law.
There's so much I can't wait to ask, I'll have to keep a little list by the front door.
Being so keen on 'family values', her thought on repealing Section 28, and how she would have voted on that, might be worth yet another question.
If, and when...
__________________
'If you're going to be a Kant, be the very best Kant there is my son.'
Johann Georg Kant, father of Immanuel Kant, philosopher.
|