Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimer
So you lose the joy and anguish of supporting Stanley, the club loses your support (financial and vocal), and EW and DO'N lose nothing whatsoever  . Don't understand, sorry.
|
Wrong.
There seems to be only 2 things which motivate these men, money and status.
They wont be getting any more of my money.
I hope the young kid who I gave me season ticket to walking out of the match enjoys the last 3 home games.
Going to away games is the perfect solution; you get to support JC and the team without giving your money to the undesirable others.
Admitadly, only a handful of voices and cash in protest to the ownership/control issue wont have a great effect, but its about principle.
If I dont like the union I stop paying subs, if I dont like my MP I dont vote for them, if I dont want like Tesco I shop in Sainsburys and with the owners of my beloved club; I dont give them any of my cash.
Its a real mix bag of a season, we have a fantastic supporter in Iylas Khan who saved the club and a trememdous effort by alot of stanley fans; however we finish the season with the same status quo and no sign of them or the club being founded/controlled by the fan base, which is ultimatly the community.
Theres only 2 ways to run Stanley. With a sugar daddy at a loss or as a community project of sorts with huge participation and support from a variety of local groups/bodies.
The situation of having an 'owner' without the financial clout to sustain the club may well result in another HMRC notice.
Role on 2010/11 away days.