Quote:
Originally Posted by Morecambe Ex Pat
I started to read this thread and I was looking forward to a decent political debate.
wagstaffe appeared to put forward some valid points but he was set upon by the 'party liners' who cannot accept that 'the other lot' could come up with a decent idea.
We have seen it with the 3 televised debates where all they seem to do is attack each other's policies and lose the plot that the future of this great country of ours is at stake.
Whilst certain parts of the electorate continue to wave their party flags and choose to blindly ignore the arguments of the other parties, good ideas will never become part of the recovery process.
I have noticed a common theme throughout this thread where an idea is ridculed as being bad but no viable alternative is put forward. The inablity to debate a point, by certain members is disguised by resorting to personal insults.
That is not debating - that is just contra argument - you can look that up on wiki or in an encyclopedia, the description will be the same.
|
technically i dont have the party flag anymore .. as they were nicked at 3.30am this morning ..
but i asked him a question .. picked something out of his policies .. something that ive been involved with at a volunteer level .. and so know something about .. and found out from my questioning he dont know anything about credit unions .. hes not even a member of his local credit union .. so as far as im concerned if you start saying about changing something when you dont know exactly how they are run .. would you vote for him?
anyway like i said before .. i give up ... well before it was i gie up .. i missed the v out ..