Accrington Web - View Single Post

Busman747 · 09-09-2004, 23:00

Two court cases hit the headlines this week.
The first was a case of an 18 year old man bedding a 12 year old girl. The man was given a 2 year conditional discharge "because," said the Judge, "she was a willing participant" It was also reported in the paper that previously, the same judge had spared another man from jail after assaulting an 8 year old..........
The second case was more local (Accrington) where a 14 year old schoolboy was sexually molested IN PUBLIC! by a 42 year old pervert.
Quotes from the LADY judge, "The case was serious and unpleasant, and the attack must have been frightening and humiliating for the adolescent victim" also, "His conduct was particularly worrying because it had taken place in public in full view of a witness and demonstrated his inability to control himself" She also said that he had a background of similar offences in '89 and '91.
To sum up, there is this 42 year old pervert who has previous convictions, can't control himself and has probably given a young lad nightmares for the rest of his life.

Last comment from Judge Barbara Watson, "His behaviour had been particularly worrying BUT A NON CUSTODIAL SENTENCE WAS THE BEST WAY OF PROTECTING THE PUBLIC"

It makes you wonder WHO should be in jail at times, the offender.....or the Judge!

09-09-2004, 23:00	#1
Busman747 Always EVIL within us Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Accrington Posts: 1,568 Blog Entries: 4 Liked: 40 times Rep Power: 1670	Recent Court Cases. Two court cases hit the headlines this week. The first was a case of an 18 year old man bedding a 12 year old girl. The man was given a 2 year conditional discharge "because," said the Judge, "she was a willing participant" It was also reported in the paper that previously, the same judge had spared another man from jail after assaulting an 8 year old.......... The second case was more local (Accrington) where a 14 year old schoolboy was sexually molested IN PUBLIC! by a 42 year old pervert. Quotes from the LADY judge, "The case was serious and unpleasant, and the attack must have been frightening and humiliating for the adolescent victim" also, "His conduct was particularly worrying because it had taken place in public in full view of a witness and demonstrated his inability to control himself" She also said that he had a background of similar offences in '89 and '91. To sum up, there is this 42 year old pervert who has previous convictions, can't control himself and has probably given a young lad nightmares for the rest of his life. Last comment from Judge Barbara Watson, "His behaviour had been particularly worrying BUT A NON CUSTODIAL SENTENCE WAS THE BEST WAY OF PROTECTING THE PUBLIC" It makes you wonder WHO should be in jail at times, the offender.....or the Judge!