Thread: 2009 Accounts
View Single Post
Old 02-08-2010, 15:39   #6
JEFF
Resting In Peace
 
JEFF's Avatar
 

Re: 2009 Accounts

Quote:
Originally Posted by lancsdave View Post
So as I understand it, if you bought something that was worth for example -£2 value in 2008 then later found it's real value at the time was -£4 then you basically paid twice it's real value ?
Cannot understand what you are saying lancsdave but I will try to explain again how I see it.

Accounts have to be restated when there has been a "material error" in the published figures. For example if something has been included in the 2008 accounts which should not have been, or something has been omitted from the 2008 accounts. Maybe invoices have been issued in May 2008 which should have been issued in June 2008 and therefore have been included in the wrong year's accounts. Maybe amounts owing in May 2008 have not been registered until June 2008 and therefore have been included in the wrong year's accounts.
JEFF is offline   Reply With Quote