Quote:
Originally Posted by JEFF
I don't know how he has the cheek to show his face at Stanley, after all, he was the one sitting around waiting for the winding up order and doing nothing, and now, when Stanley appear to be on a sound footing he wants a piece of the action again. He is the one who should have a BANNING ORDER against him and not the SU2.
|
Of course he NOW wants a piece of the action. When the winding up order took place he owned 51% of nothing, now he owns 51% of a debt-free football league club. As majority share holder he can basically do what he wants and go where he pleases. In my opinion he still owns the club.
Or am I mistaken?
