Quote:
Originally Posted by bdc
I am against having a committee being formed as a board to govern the club, I think that it would be better to have the committee/ fans group being used to elect an independent board at an annual AGM (These should be voted in every year). I think having a number of individuals being involved in key decision making would take to long as a process to make decisions that are required to be made at a fast rate. I think that having fans as the main shareholders of the club is a good idea but ultimately this shouldn't involve EW or DON. Outside investment or commercial deals will not feed through to the club until we have shed our ghosts from the past so to speak.
I seem to recall that it was mentioned that the ASSF would be involved as the model for the fans to use to buy and sell shares etc. I personally think that surely this would be better to be discussed between the ASSF, OSC and the Ultras to form a group that suits all the needs of the groups. I think that we could potentially use the OSC as the basis of the committee model as there are a number of systems in place including for the payment of subscriptions which is integrated within the club infrastructure already. There is also monthly meetings being held and the OSC is starting to build up after a period of inactivity.
|
bdc, there is more of an overlap between O.S.C./A.S.S.F. and The Ultras than more people think/realise....
