Quote:
Originally Posted by garinda
Whether it's affordable or not, or even if it's good or bad, regarding publicly funded art, apparently the tax payer has sadly no say on whether they want to fund it or not.
On your last point, don't worry.
When my last good typing finger no longer does as I want it to, I'll sellotape an old biro to my forehead, and I'll carry on tapping away.
Carry on tapping out, what I believe to be the truth. That being that the majority of people don't agree that their hard earned taxes are spent on such fripperies as 'community art'. More so, when the country is in the dire straits it currently is.
Financially, and morally, the vanity of state funded art is unaffordable.
|
Affordable or unaffordable, it don't make much difference to me, anything that is classed as a leisure pursuit should be funded by those who use or are interested in it. I would imagine that 80% of the general public have never given a fig for art of any kind, I'm in that category