08-11-2010, 10:09
|
#624
|
Resting in Peace
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In a state of confusion
Posts: 36,973
Liked: 715 times
Rep Power: 76554
|
Re: The value of public funded art
Quote:
Originally Posted by garinda
I don't really understand what you're saying.
Doesn't it make a difference to you, even though you say art isn't of interest to you, that you're funding it, regardless as to whether you want to, or not?
If someone was struggling to keep a roof over their familys' heads, and hard to find money to keep them warm and fed, they'd be pretty stupid spending money having the front door painted.
State funded art schemes seem unwanted, by the vast majority of people, who see very little value and worth in them, both finacially and artistically.
Still, it's only 'two bob' of your money...or £2,000.00, to be more precise, if you want to teach the next generation of Banksys to pefect their tag in an Accrington park, before sharing their graffiti with us on a lager scale.
|
If two grand helps to stimulate the minds of some young people and gives them an interest other than wrecking parks and standing on street corners making a complete nuisance of themselves, then its money well spent, because it will save money in the long run
__________________
35 YEARS AND COUNTING
|
|
|