Quote:
Originally Posted by football19
Dave,I thought they both did ok,but its hard to impress in pre-season. If i had to choose,i would say the lad in the second half was more effective,but the "Jay mcEvilly" lookalike, was a bit stronger,but as Deano has found,they dont tend to go for young centre-backs in league 2,so they would probably have to play fullback for a while,and the second lad would make a better go of that.
|
I wouldn't expect either of them to go straight in to the first 11 due to their lack of experience, but I reckon if they get them as squad players they could both be useful and would be capable of holding their own when given the chance ( does that sound contradictory ?
)
As you say Lynchy ( the 2nd half one ) is slightly more versatile than the Jay lookalike who is built more for stopping opponents than playing round them
