Quote:
Originally Posted by garinda
Yes, but what i'm saying is if someone is that good they could set up their own business, for a minimal amount, without going to the expense of buying someone else's named store.
Good will in fashion is worth diddly squat, and someone else's held stock will soon date, and might not be what you'd have bought anyway.
I do know what I'm talking about. It's Gene herself that's valuable, without her, not so much.
Let's hope the rumour's wrong.
It's at odds with the interview last year in the Telegraph.
|
Well never thought of it like that Rindi, some businesses are sold with good will, never thought about the rag trade, which is obviously a bit different