Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil
Your comments are as pathetic as the the overpaid muppet comment, both of you obviously have no idea what you are talking about.
|
I'm at a loss.
Why is A--b's opinion dismissed as pathetic?
He's probably the most academically qualified person on here, when it comes to talking about art. Certainly a little more so than myself. Which is probably why we were both approached by the organisation involved to sit on their board.
On this occasion I actually liked what these people did. I thought it was bold, and worked as a piece of enviromental art.
As I presume it was funded by the lottery, I've no problem there. That's profit raised from people who choose to play it. It's not tax.
My only comment was regarding the execution. Noting that it started to peel off, only a few weeks after it was done. That seemed a shame, after all the work that the young people must have put into it.
The wet and damp weather doesn't affect billboards like that. They're up for months.
When it was first done I think it visually looked better than it does now.
But as Gayle said, it wasn't meant to be there forever. It was a short-term project, as far as the end display was concerned.