Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Moss
Probably because questions are raised on this forum, answers are given but they don't quite fit with what the questioner thinks and so the questioner implies that facts have never been given in order to justify his own posts.
There are also any number of 'people in the know' and 'sources' who seem very keen to supply their own 'facts' from the safety of the shadows. These people are always believed over anyone who puts their name to an answer and it makes the statements from people in positions of authority completely meaningless. There are much better ways of spending time than giving answers to an internet forum that simply won't listen to what it is being told.
Accyweb wanted answers and it has had them. Truthful, factual, straight from the horse's mouth. However, there is only so many times a straight answer can be given before the novelty of having it spun into something else wears off.
I'm afraid the refusal by certain members to properly read what I have posted has worn me down too.
|
So why the need for you to be Rod Hull, to Cllr. Pritchard's Emu?
She's obviously taking an interest, logging on to chastise people for what they've posted in this thread, but unprepared to speak to everyone who posted their opposition to what's happened.
Despite her not being the person responsible for the decision, you did admit the issue falls under her responsibilities, having the town centre under her remit.