Quote:
Originally Posted by MargaretR
I do have plenty of time on my hands to search your old posts but you flatter yourself by thinking that I would bother to do it.
You aren't worth the effort. I am indifferent to the fact that you choose to trawl mine.
The fact that you have, gives credence to my opinion of you.
This post has been a waste of two minutes of my time too.
|
Thought so.
Come out with absolute rubbish, and are then unable to come out with any facts to back up what you spout.
Don't know why I'm suprised, as that also applies to 99% of your posts, including the just plain nasty ones.
However, I choose to read your drivel, as it helps me better understand the emotion that's called pity.
If you insist on reading my posts, and commenting, get used to the fact there may be a retort.
If you're too feeble-mnded to cope, please feel free to put me on ignore.
I'd take it as a sign of your guilt, when charged with being pitiful.
Anyhow, back on thread.
Apparently in law, any date before 1189 is officially refered to as time immemorial.
Who'd have thought?
R.I.P.
