14-11-2011, 16:42
|
#89
|
God Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Paradise Lost
Posts: 7,220
Liked: 11 times
Rep Power: 4266
|
Re: Internationalist approach at H.B.C.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gynn
IIt explains why no councillors have been on this website defending what they voted for, because the fact is they haven't a clue what the facts are.
|
I'd certainly concur with that. I doubt if most of the current mob of councillors could find Kashmir on the map; it would not surprise me if some of 'em thought it was somewhere in Burnley.
Ignorance is no excuse, however for what they did. I doubt if the decision could now be reversed, so possibly our illustrious councillors can now consider the ramifications of what they have done. The other party to Kashmir is of course India. That country is now one of the largest investors into the UK - only last week, a further 1000 jobs were announced as a result of additional investment into Jaguar-Land Rover. There are numerous other examples around the UK.
I doubt very much though, that Indian businessmen will now be looking at Hyndburn to make their investments. That’s a shame, because the town could certainly do with the jobs. We're certainly not going to get them from Pakistan, because that economy is a basket case and much of the money we do give 'em as aid ends up paying for terrorist activity in Kashmir.
|
|
|