Accrington Web - View Single Post

Tealeaf · 14-01-2012, 22:55

I've just gone over the original twitter feed and it simply does not make sense.

9.01 (Twitter time) A Dad proposes the motion, backed by Britcliffe who is '..proud to support it'.

9.02 Collinge says it ain't balanced (fair enough).

9.04 M Dad proposes amendment

9.10 Amendment passed.

Either this amendment was aleady on the table (in which case it should have been in the agenda) or it was not. If it was not, there is no way such an elaborate amendment could have been put togeather in the space of 8 minutes. Something is sadly wrong here and it stinks of complicity and cover up.

14-01-2012, 22:55	#333
Tealeaf God Member Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Paradise Lost Posts: 7,220 Liked: 11 times Rep Power: 4266	Re: Internationalist approach at H.B.C. I've just gone over the original twitter feed and it simply does not make sense. 9.01 (Twitter time) A Dad proposes the motion, backed by Britcliffe who is '..proud to support it'. 9.02 Collinge says it ain't balanced (fair enough). 9.04 M Dad proposes amendment 9.10 Amendment passed. Either this amendment was aleady on the table (in which case it should have been in the agenda) or it was not. If it was not, there is no way such an elaborate amendment could have been put togeather in the space of 8 minutes. Something is sadly wrong here and it stinks of complicity and cover up.