Quote:
Originally Posted by ToffeeGuy
Imagine a person has been earning £100,000p.a. for years, contributing roughly £50,000 a year in tax. Through no fault of their own they are made redundant. Because of the benefit cap they would have to move house, change schools for their kids and generally uproot to an area where it is more difficult to travel to/get a new job. Thus reducing the chances of them getting a new job within days/weeks/months and off benefits.
Don't presume that everyone who receives benefits hasn't contributed to it fully and when they need it should be entitled to it.
|
So, in soft sap land, there should be no cap at all, on the amount of Housing Benefit anyone is able to get?
Blenheim Palace's suddenly vacated, and a family on benefits from Croydon fancy some Oxforshire country air.
You'd be happy stumping up £324,000.00 per week to fund their chosen location to rent, I suppose?
Give me strength, to suffer the soft in the head, bleeding heart liberals, more gladly.
Please.