View Single Post
Old 05-03-2012, 20:39   #32
garinda
Give, give, give member
 
garinda's Avatar
 

Re: Same Sex Marriages.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington View Post
I really do not care about what sexual orientation someone is.
And if they want to have some sort of religious ceremony, then that is fine by me.
What I do not agree with, is the wording of the draft bill which will change the denomination 'Husband and Wife' to 'Parties in Marriage' .
This is something that Stonewall is seeking for same sex marriages, because obviously there isn't (strictly speaking) a husband and wife.
They want to change something traditional, to the detriment of the many, for the benefit of the few.
Leave the husband and wife names as they are for heterosexual marriage, but allow same sex partnerships to assume the new format if they wish.
My husband is my husband...he is not a party in marriage.
Oh I quite agree Marg.

How stupid.

What are they going to say in the service?

'Do you Ethel, take Albert Aloysius, as your lawful wedded party?'

Daft.
__________________
'If you're going to be a Kant, be the very best Kant there is my son.'
Johann Georg Kant, father of Immanuel Kant, philosopher.






garinda is offline   Reply With Quote