![]() |
Re: Puzzle for kaytex
Quote:
The other church is definitely NEW Jerusalem on Abbey St, it was finished in 1847/8. Oak St Congy's was'nt built until 1861. As for Katy's complaint about compass directions, and the left a bit etc, depends which way your looking when you say left a bit. Retlaw. |
Re: Puzzle for kaytex
Quote:
Ged away wi th Oak St Chapel wernt built then. Retlaw. |
Re: Puzzle for kaytex
1 Attachment(s)
This is a picture of Accrington from the air taken some time around 1933, you can see that Grange lane has been raised to meet the bottom of Timber St, Welly St and Manchester Rd, the Toll House has gone and the site
where the Fire Station was built has been cleared. I've labeled some of the main buildings, so Katy will know which way to look with her left a bit directions. Whoever took that picture was about 250 yrds to the right of where the 1848 picture was taken from, but he had the advantage of wings, the 1848 artist did'nt. Retlaw. |
Re: Puzzle for kaytex
Tra la la la, tra la la - I still think you are W-R-O-N-G! and that I know the REAL answer Tra la la la la.
|
Re: Puzzle for kaytex
1 Attachment(s)
Phew, having trouble scanning. Only doing half a picture, but .. better than nothing. ARE YOU READY FOR MY RESPONSE ....... (and if you tell me this building wasnt built then, I will CRY!) - i dont think the second building is a church at all ......
BANK HOUSE, thats what I think the building in the background of the Christ Church photo is ..... BANK HOUSE! :tongueout This view would also be in the artists sight I am sure. What we see here is the side wall of Bank House and a "tower" which I think is what can be seen on your sketch. Well ..........?????? |
Re: Puzzle for kaytex
Have a funny feeling that you are both talking about different buildings on the picture .. :confused:
I'm looking at the one in the middle ? |
Re: Puzzle for kaytex
quote=Atarah;754680]Tra la la la, tra la la - I still think you are W-R-O-N-G! and that I know the REAL answer Tra la la la la.[/quote]
Tra la la la be blowed you only know the real answer cause I told you one hour ago. And it Is THE NEW Jerusalm you skenning bat. Get the street plan of 1848 I once gave you, and use a ruler from the position I gave you, and all will be revealed, and put your glasses on and think 1848 not 1948. Oak St Chapel didn't exist in 1848 how many times do you have to be told. :theband: Retlaw. |
Re: Puzzle for kaytex
Quote:
Retlaw. |
Re: Puzzle for kaytex
Quote:
Do we actually know who painted this ? .. we only know that Enoch Bowker 'published' it. |
Re: Puzzle for kaytex
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Its the New Jerusalem on Abbey St, Oak St had one tall spire similar to the Wesleys on Spring Gardens. Retlaw. |
Re: Puzzle for kaytex
Quote:
Yes .. but Atarah thought you were talking about the building on the right of Christ Church...right? Which is clearly Bank House. Oak Street never came into the equation.. :confused: Oh Blooming hek Retlaw .. just tell us where you think it was taken from ... LOL. The 100 yards answer was near enough ... go on then .. Royds Street. Is it possible to mark the spot for posterity ? :D |
Re: Puzzle for kaytex
Aaah .. think you are getting mixed up with your answers to Bagpuss ..... this gets funnier ...... :D:D
|
Re: Puzzle for kaytex
Retlaw - I can sense the rise in your blood pressure - best to give the answer before it gets worse;)
|
Re: Puzzle for kaytex
Quote:
Your improving, thats near enough, the artist was stood where the houses would be built on Eaton Bank near the juction with Royds St. Thats the reason I could'nt duplicate the picture with the camera, all the buildings and the trees in front of Eaton Bank are in the way, but 60 ft up in the air above that house and all is revealed, then the viewing angle changes. Retlaw. There is supposed to be a similar picture some where that was painted from the bedroom of that house, but I've never seen it, but I'm going to make enquiries. |
Re: Puzzle for kaytex
1 Attachment(s)
To finalise then .. we are talking round about here:-
Attachment 14666 That is, of course, if the artist did not embellish his/her painting.;) I'm off now >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank's for an entertaining thread. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:19. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com