![]() |
Re: Dingbats Round Three
know it back to front?
|
Re: Dingbats Round Three
This is driving me mad now because that answer sounds so feasable and yet it isn't the right one!
|
Re: Dingbats Round Three
know it forwards and backwards?
|
Re: Dingbats Round Three
is it know it inside out
|
Re: Dingbats Round Three
No it's back?
|
Re: Dingbats Round Three
No it is in the middle?
|
Re: Dingbats Round Three
its in a no, no, situation
|
Re: Dingbats Round Three
post 65 is the closest. (I think) :D
|
Re: Dingbats Round Three
|
Re: Dingbats Round Three
Here's another go. If I call 'it' a thing we've got no-thing- on = Nothing on?
|
Re: Dingbats Round Three
Quote:
|
Re: Dingbats Round Three
Yes Less, it certainly is:D . Willow remarked earlier that it was rather a sneaky one so I have started thinking that way. Whether or not it will do any good remains to be seen :)
|
Re: Dingbats Round Three
No it is back to front??
|
Re: Dingbats Round Three
i have just got out of bed to put this,,,,its doing my head in lol
It takes one to know one .......................................... |
Re: Dingbats Round Three
no turning back
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:32. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com