![]() |
re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Hitler Stalin Mussolini and Jimmy Saville thats a collection of names you dont usually see in the same sentence:rolleyes: Totally agree john.
|
re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Those dictators were named to illustrate the point that 'speaking ill of the dead' is done selectively - and who has the right to decide who is selected?
|
re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
I realise that john, I think this thread has moved into the barmpot section, persons are linking Sir Jimmy with Hitler and Mussolini, mass murderers. What has jimmy ever been found guilty of, absolutely nothing, it just shows what links can be made when you talk out of an orifice not designed for conversation |
re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
If Jimmy Savile felt the need to work as a porter in a high-security mental hospital for the criminally insane then he should have been more discrete about taking part in a photo like this! |
re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
Your ignoring the facts as usual! Why is Jimmy Savile posing with a psycho only after 10 years in prison after what he did and what he put this country through with what he did! Why do you think that is right! 10 years and allowed to pose with celebrities it seems all wrong! |
re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
You cant ignore facts of misdemeanors if you don't provide any, what facts are you putting forward to support your implications. You keep going back to the photo, but never mention Frank Bruno, he is also in the photo. What heinous crime has he committed, what about voluntary prison visitors, they mix with hardened criminals, what have they done against society. You seem to be putting forward the argument that you can be guilty by association. This is a very slippery slope, and it is something you have argued against in your" illegal drug" forum posts, and I have to say you took great exception to your "guilty by association" link against you. thanks for the unsigned bad karma by the way |
re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
They are as bad as each other for having anything to do with him. |
re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
The allegation was that there has been a cover up with regard to Sir Jim, but no support for this claim has been put forward, only guilt by association. This is a blunderbuss defense, throwing in everything and hoping something sticks, and as I stated previously some of the theories have moved into the barmpot section |
re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
The guy is a troll, and only likes to get a reaction. How he has the audacity to call others a troll is beyond me. He abodes in the largest metropolis in this fair land, it is not like he hasn't got anything better to do, but spends his time trying to wind folk up on here. TROLL:jimbo: |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:30. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com