Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   Madness Returns (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/madness-returns-24723.html)

SPUGGIE J 09-10-2006 05:16

Madness Returns
 
Well looks like the North Koreans have done it this time with its nuclear test. China gets 20 mins warning and the rest of the world find out thanks to a 4+ ricter scale earthquake. A paria state now has the bom in a very nervy part of the world so where do we go from hear. If N Korea ignores what China says then what chance for the rest of the worlds countries.

andrewb 09-10-2006 06:03

Re: Madness Returns
 
Just read this on the bbc. I wonder what America is going to say.

SPUGGIE J 09-10-2006 06:39

Re: Madness Returns
 
I am more worried about what they will do. The Korean war only stopped due to a ceasefire and in theory could blow up again. The nuclear ambitions of N Korea could be construde as hostile and another notch up to war. The deciding factor this time will be wether they have like '50 - '53 Chinese support. There are already gitters in the fanancial markets and thats how to hurt the major western economies.

WillowTheWhisp 09-10-2006 07:10

Re: Madness Returns
 
So far they have nuclear ability but they don't have anything small enough to make into a bomb and attach to a missile. It's doubtful they could even get it on board a plane.

What I find ironic is the statement "We will no longer be sending aid to North Korea" - they have been receiving aid and what have they been wasting this on instead of where it should have been going? - developing nuclear weaponry!!

Neil 09-10-2006 09:44

Re: Madness Returns
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WillowTheWhisp
What I find ironic is the statement "We will no longer be sending aid to North Korea" - they have been receiving aid and what have they been wasting this on instead of where it should have been going? - developing nuclear weaponry!!

Its the same with Pakistan isn't it. Only yesterday the news reported on people living in shelters since the earthquake there and needing International aid. Haven't they been busy spending money on nuclear testing as well.

I think a preemptive strike on Korea would be a good idea. We could do with testing our nukes still work after all these years of stock piling.

After that maybe Pakistan and India might listen when we say stop developing nuclear weapons or they can have it next.

Ianto.W. 09-10-2006 14:28

Re: Madness Returns
 
It's a tough one this, one wonders what there motives are, what have they to gain from it?
Will the chinese support them?, the good lord couldn't tell you what they will do, I only hope Dubya Bush does not jump in feet first as he usually does.

SPUGGIE J 09-10-2006 14:54

Re: Madness Returns
 
Unless there is a firm stand that shows the world means business then what about Irans ambitions? To do nothing other than mump and moan will give tehran the green light to make their own A bomb and aim it at Isreal and we all have an idea what will happen then.

steeljack 09-10-2006 17:12

Re: Madness Returns
 
Seems a bit hypocrisy is creeping into the outrage and foot stamping being shown by the administration in Washington

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortu...2316/index.htm

Ianto.W. 09-10-2006 19:40

Re: Madness Returns
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by steeljack
Seems a bit hypocrisy is creeping into the outrage and foot stamping being shown by the administration in Washington

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortu...2316/index.htm

A most enlightening article thank you.

SPUGGIE J 09-10-2006 20:18

Re: Madness Returns
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by steeljack
Seems a bit hypocrisy is creeping into the outrage and foot stamping being shown by the administration in Washington

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortu...2316/index.htm

From a quick read I get the impression DR is torn between getting dosh in the bank or war. For someone who was like a rabid dog over Iraq he seems now to have become a sloth ove N. Korea.

steeljack 09-10-2006 20:23

Re: Madness Returns
 
the 24 hour news channels are playing this up non-stop, now all the chatter is about the new Japanese Prime Minister not trusting the US/west for its defense so the fear being expessed is that Japan will change its constitution and start its own nuclear program

SPUGGIE J 09-10-2006 20:30

Re: Madness Returns
 
Looks like a nuclear arms race could unfold and the Japanese are savy and skilled enough to do it in double quick time. Apt title now as we are close to a rerun of the cold war SE Asia style and god help us if it gets out of hand. :(

BLACKBURN RAVER 09-10-2006 20:41

Re: Madness Returns
 
and heres me thinking suggs n co were all set for a tour of accy :rolleyes:

andrewb 09-10-2006 21:48

Re: Madness Returns
 
Better start building our accyweb sponsored shelter? At least we'll keep each other entertained for about 40years.

mani 09-10-2006 22:48

Re: Madness Returns
 
see what i think is that usa is nothing short of hypocritical

it uses the UN defence council to its own means...

example

india/pakistan test bombs and sanctions are placed by UN. usa/india sign big business deal - sanctions lifted. pakistan allows usa to use its soil for afganistan and iraq - sanctions lifted. usa refuses to supply pakistan with f-16's china agrees to supply pakistan with fighters. f-16's a few months later deleivered to pakistan.

the same will happen with this. russia and china who have very good diplomatic links wiht n korea will simply continue as normal and usa will realise its on the end of a financial disadvantage - esp when it comes to china and will take steps to improve relations.

with china on its doorstep - n korea is under no false illusions that it is s-asia's big boy. its not. the fact that usa has continued such a one sided support program of japan and s-korea its pushed n korea to facilitate its own defences.

cashman 09-10-2006 22:51

Re: Madness Returns
 
good article steeljack, and as iantow says its certainly a tough one, my view is at the end of the day theres 8 nations already have nuclear weapons, and i wouldn't say all 8 leaders are the safest pair of hands? on the track record of some of these leaders, why shouldn't N.Korea have one as well? my personal opinion is NO one should have them.

Ianto.W. 10-10-2006 12:18

Re: Madness Returns
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mani
see what i think is that usa is nothing short of hypocritical

it uses the UN defence council to its own means...

example

india/pakistan test bombs and sanctions are placed by UN. usa/india sign big business deal - sanctions lifted. pakistan allows usa to use its soil for afganistan and iraq - sanctions lifted. usa refuses to supply pakistan with f-16's china agrees to supply pakistan with fighters. f-16's a few months later deleivered to pakistan.

the same will happen with this. russia and china who have very good diplomatic links wiht n korea will simply continue as normal and usa will realise its on the end of a financial disadvantage - esp when it comes to china and will take steps to improve relations.

with china on its doorstep - n korea is under no false illusions that it is s-asia's big boy. its not. the fact that usa has continued such a one sided support program of japan and s-korea its pushed n korea to facilitate its own defences.

Ten out of ten for that view Mani, I did not look at the situation from N Koreas camp, but it makes sense now, thank's.

Bazf 10-10-2006 16:36

Re: Madness Returns
 
see what i think is that usa is nothing short of hypocritical

it uses the UN defence council to its own means...

example

india/pakistan test bombs and sanctions are placed by UN. usa/india sign big business deal - sanctions lifted. pakistan allows usa to use its soil for afganistan and iraq - sanctions lifted. usa refuses to supply pakistan with f-16's china agrees to supply pakistan with fighters. f-16's a few months later deleivered to pakistan.

the same will happen with this. russia and china who have very good diplomatic links wiht n korea will simply continue as normal and usa will realise its on the end of a financial disadvantage - esp when it comes to china and will take steps to improve relations.

with china on its doorstep - n korea is under no false illusions that it is s-asia's big boy. its not. the fact that usa has continued such a one sided support program of japan and s-korea its pushed n korea to facilitate its own defences.





The US are often badmouthed, particularly at the moment, as people see their foreign policy as purely looking after their own interests. Well they do, but in their case it is in their interests to stop other nations becoming powerful via the proliferation of weapons, which in fact serves the purposes of everyone on the planet who do not want to see a World War again.

We can't pretend to live in a perfect world where it is ok for everyone to have massive weapons, and I for one would rather they stayed in the hands of the americans, who by the way are our ALLIES, than have them in the hands of a communist nutcase who has openly stated that he would sell the technology to the highest bidder.

The Americans would PREFER Korea to be a united country without Nuclear weapons as well which is why they wanted Kim to stop trying to build them. Now that he has got them, as the leaders of the Western World, they can't just sit back and let him continue to build an Arsenal and then watch as he marches into S Korea as no-one tries to stop him because they are under threat of Nuclear Attack.

As their nearest neighbours, the Chinese should be the ones taking the responsibility for dealing with N Korea but unfortunately they haven't done so, so the UN needs to step in, and its the US who make things happen there.

Can we put sanctions on a nation where millions are sarving? how many of the people died from lack of food because he was using all the money to build nuclear weapons?

now mani I don't want to pick holes in your argument but the f16 deal was quashed because the Pakistani's wanted the updated missile codes which the US won't give them because they are not part of NATO, so they had to look elsewhere hence China stepping in.

China is trying to become a trading nation and as such has lifted a lot of restrictions that it imposed for a lot of years, for example you no longer need to use a chinese bank to do business, you no longer need a member of the ruling party as a trading partner and you can vist the factories that are producing your goods.

The main thing to remember is you have a dictator that is starving his people, and wants ultimate power in a region that has been stable since the 50s. If you think that because he can tell the USA to F off by getting nukes that he's a good old boy ,you really need to reexamine your way of determining your affiliations.

simon 11-10-2006 20:46

Re: Madness Returns
 
I wonder what the enviromental effect of testing NUKES is ???????

SPUGGIE J 12-10-2006 06:19

Re: Madness Returns
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by simon
I wonder what the enviromental effect of testing NUKES is ???????

Maybe plenty but the states have been practicing zapping "Little Kim"

LancYorkYankee 12-10-2006 17:53

Re: Madness Returns
 
Quite well said Bazf. Your thread beat me to the punch!

JohnW 12-10-2006 19:03

Re: Madness Returns
 
You're right of course Cashman, no-one should have nuclear weapons, however, they are a fact of life and they are not going away, so that is not even a option worth considering. No-one will ever trust the other countries in the world enough to disarm competely. So, they are here to stay and we have to learn to live with that. Also, I have never fully understood how countries who have nuclear weapons consider they have the right to tell smaller countries that they can't develop them. Can you imagine when the longbow was invented one lot saying to the other lot, "Hey, WE invented the longbow, you lot can't come in to battle and use them against US." How ridiculous. Mr. Churchill tried this kind of tack with America when the Yanks were building up their navy and it looked as if they would eventually have more ships than the Brits. Churchill told them they shouldn't do that, that the British navy needed to be the most powerful in the world because we had a Commonwealth to service. Yea! Like that worked!!

So, I really don't see how we can stop countries building them, we just have to have many more and better ones, which, of course, we do. We also need to ensure that our defences against their, less sofisticated, weaponry is adequate. That is the only deterrent against them using their bombs. I have to say, it would appear that the total destruction of the earth gets nearer with every passing year. As long as there are men on earth, you can bet your life there'll be trouble.


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:27.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com