Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/panoptican-and-panopticant-27092.html)

WillowTheWhisp 26-12-2006 09:44

PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
10 Attachment(s)
On Christmas Eve we decided to go on a Panopticon hunt after church, well it makes a change from coming home and having Sunday dinner doesn't it?

As we were already in Blackburn we went to look at that one first. Of course you have to know it's in Corporation Park because you can't actually see it from any part of Blackburn. You can't see it from most of Corporation Park either come to think of it but knowing it's at the top end off Revidge Road does help and it is signposted once you get inside the park. :D

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/a...1&d=1167127910
It's just a pity that the person who made the sign doesn't know how to spell panopticon, despite there being a huge placard only yards away.

It's not looking quite so colourful as it was when new.

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/a...1&d=1167128537

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/a...2&d=1167128537

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/a...3&d=1167128537


http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/a...4&d=1167128537

From there we went over to Burnley to visit the Singing Ringing Tree.

Unfortunately it had started to turn foggy as we headed off up the road towards Rossendale. Although we kept our eyes peeled we were totally unable to tell if the structure can be viewed from the road.

As we approached the familiar Panopticon placard we met an intrepid couple returning from their chilly hike over the fog bound moors to seek out the Singing Ringing Tree and I couldn't help musing to myself that the placards are more noticeable than the actual panopticons themselves. The couple assured us that it wasn't more than quarter of a mile away and the path "wasn't bad" so off we went as the fog closed in around us. A little way along the path we spotted something in the distance - which turned out to be somebody else who'd been off down there to look at it. They assured us it wasn't far now.

Then mysteriously ahead of us in the fog - there it was.

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/a...1&d=1167129111

Em ran on ahead. By this time we were freezing cold and the wind was blowing round our ears.

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/a...1&d=1167129316

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/a...1&d=1167129316

Unfortunately despite the freezing wind the flippin tree totally refused to sing to us. :rolleyes:


http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/a...1&d=1167129316

So we left it to the shrouding fog and headed for home.

The first couple we met had said they planned on returning another day because they still wanted to hear it sing. Maybe we should have directed them to Neil's video on AccyWeb :)




Busman747 27-12-2006 11:15

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
4 Attachment(s)
In my capacity of Chauffer to the waffler, I was dragged along to view what was and still is in my opinion, a terrible waste of finances. I was totally unimpressed by either Panopticon but for the sake of Gayles sanity, had no urge to yet again put my opinions down on the Accyweb.............:)

However....

I feel that I must bring up the safety aspect regarding "Colour Fields" in Blackburn.:eek:

In the picture below, notice how the parapet hangs over the edge of a drop that is perhaps 15ft or so.


http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/a...6&d=1167221074


It is designed so that people can put their weight on the railings as they admire the views of Blackburns Industry.........


http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/a...7&d=1167221074



All that seems to be preventing them from plunging to the ground is 4 bolts:eek:

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/a...9&d=1167221074




There MAY be some type of mastic between the plates although there is no sign of any or welding as there are gaps that allow you to see right through...........and the scariest thing is that during the construction, they must have run out of washers as many of the bolts just have bog standard nuts fitted with no washers or other securing devices, a vandal with a basic tool set could render this Panopticon a deathtrap in moments :eek:

WillowTheWhisp 27-12-2006 11:25

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Below the overhang is quite a steep slope too which is very slippery when wet so even when you walk down the steps at the opposite side you are on dangerous ground. Wouldn't it have been better to have a level area at the base so that those steps actually led down to something?

Maybe everyone else is afraid of commenting here.
:D

garinda 27-12-2006 12:37

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Blimey how cheap was the paint and carpet they used in Corporation Park?

I hope they kept the guarantee.

Doug 27-12-2006 12:46

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Thank you for sharing this expedition of yours with us, nice to see the things in the raw. The Blackburn one is a disgrace and in my eyes nothing but vandalism. The Burley one looks better in some of your photos Willow.

flashy 27-12-2006 12:47

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
i'm gonna venture up there sometime this week and see if it actually does sing

cashman 27-12-2006 13:05

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WillowTheWhisp (Post 356919)
Below the overhang is quite a steep slope too which is very slippery when wet so even when you walk down the steps at the opposite side you are on dangerous ground. Wouldn't it have been better to have a level area at the base so that those steps actually led down to something?

Maybe everyone else is afraid of commenting here.
:D

not really willow if i go off on one about this,more afraid of getting banned.;)

garinda 27-12-2006 13:12

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
The Blackburn one looks like the entrance to an East German block of flats, fallen on hard times.

WillowTheWhisp 27-12-2006 13:41

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
I was really disappointed that the Burnley one didn't sing to us that day but it was interesting how it slowly loomed up out of the fog - quite eerie. Maybe the fog had something to do with it dampening the sound.

garinda 27-12-2006 14:16

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
I like the photographs of the Singing Ringing Tree, very atmospheric.

If there is fog, that means there is no wind, doesn't it? High atmospheric pressure, and all the precipition below 2,000 feet and all that, which would explain why it wasn't 'singing'.

Busman747 27-12-2006 14:41

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Surprisingly, there was quite a gusty wind despite the fog.............and freezing!!!

chav1 27-12-2006 15:00

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
the first one isnt bad but i thought these things were supposed to be wheel chair friendly , all a person in a wheelchair will get a view of is the steps

2nd on is exactly why people dont want anything on the coppice , it sticks out like a sore thumb , ruins teh scenery and to be frank a peice of sh1t that some halfwit will have gotten paid thousands to design and stick a label on it saying " this is art"

infact i think i made somthing similar with lollypop sticks when i was in juniour school but smaller :D

garinda 27-12-2006 15:11

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by chav1 (Post 356999)
infact i think i made somthing similar with lollypop sticks when i was in juniour school but smaller :D

You went to school?:eek: :D

WillowTheWhisp 27-12-2006 15:32

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
No, he went to somethng like school, but smaller.

Wynonie Harris 27-12-2006 15:48

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by chav1 (Post 356999)
and to be frank a peice of sh1t that some halfwit will have gotten paid thousands to design and stick a label on it saying " this is art":D

Brilliantly put and exactly my sentiments on both of 'em! What a scandal that public money is being wasted on complete and utter garbage like this!

Gayle 27-12-2006 18:34

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
I don't know where to start on this one.

Once the Panopticon is built it is 'handed' over to the council in who's area it resides. The Blackburn sign is a joke - I can't believe they didn't check the spelling! As for the maintenance - it's terrible that they haven't taken any care of it! It's dirty and needs a good clean. The railings are safe according to the council's health and safety. The railings were actually installed because of the council's health and safety department and I agree, they do detract from the design and style. As for wheelchair access, people in wheelchair's are able to get onto the structure, not just to the highest level of it which is perfectly acceptable and there are other examples where wheelchair users are unable to get to the very highest level.

In its defence - the cannon batteries were in an appalling state of repair and a dog had committed suicide by jumping off one of them - they would have been knocked down for health and safety reasons. The Panopticon repaired them and has allowed them to be kept for a while longer.

As for Burnley, in my opinion it's beautiful, it makes a wonderful eerie noise and judging by the number of people that are always up there it is doing its job.

Hyndburn has missed out big style. The Burnley design has been seen by people far and wide, it is attracting huge good publicity for Burnley and is part of the many regeneration projects going on in the town. It is attracting more money for the town and is having a positive effect.

Now I will agree that the design for Hyndburn wasn't suitable but by rejecting the whole project a whole lot more was rejected. If people had been able to say 'no' to the design but 'yes' to the principle of the thing then we could have worked with everyone to get the design that was appropriate for the town.

grego 27-12-2006 19:28

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
I think the Burnley one looks ok but the one in Blackburn is a real eye sore.

chav1 27-12-2006 19:40

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
that one in blackburn reminds me of blackburn royal infirmary

yellow line to x-ray
red line to casualty etc :D

Wynonie Harris 27-12-2006 19:47

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gayle (Post 357060)
it is attracting huge good publicity for Burnley and is part of the many regeneration projects going on in the town. It is attracting more money for the town and is having a positive effect.

What's all this "huge good publicity" it's attracting? I haven't seen any sign of it. And how is it attracting more money to the town and having a "positive effect"?

Busman747 27-12-2006 21:39

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gayle (Post 357060)
I don't know where to start on this one.

Once the Panopticon is built it is 'handed' over to the council in who's area it resides. The Blackburn sign is a joke - I can't believe they didn't check the spelling! As for the maintenance - it's terrible that they haven't taken any care of it! It's dirty and needs a good clean. The railings are safe according to the council's health and safety. The railings were actually installed because of the council's health and safety department and I agree, they do detract from the design and style. As for wheelchair access, people in wheelchair's are able to get onto the structure, not just to the highest level of it which is perfectly acceptable and there are other examples where wheelchair users are unable to get to the very highest level.

In its defence - the cannon batteries were in an appalling state of repair and a dog had committed suicide by jumping off one of them - they would have been knocked down for health and safety reasons. The Panopticon repaired them and has allowed them to be kept for a while longer.

As for Burnley, in my opinion it's beautiful, it makes a wonderful eerie noise and judging by the number of people that are always up there it is doing its job.

Hyndburn has missed out big style.

Firstly, Welcome back Gayle, hope that you have had an enjoyable Christmas (or should it be "Seasonal Break?":p )

Willow and I didn't set out to go Panopticon bashing but it wasn't hard to criticise and extremely hard to find any positives. I will agree with you that quite a few people seem to be making their way to the "all singing" scaffolding at Burnley (four others while we were there) I must admit that it has a lure in that people want to hear it making a noise, (us included) It was quite difficult to find as it is NOT sign-posted from the main road and if you are given instructions to "turn left" into Crown Point Road you are likely to zoom past as there is only one sign and that favours the traffic from Rawtenstall rather than Burnley:confused: The rope fence is err slightly unprofessional?

As for the "Colour Fields" in Blackburn, what a waste of time and fuel!! Access is via Revidge road but again there are no signs unless you spot the large boarding actually in the park that has the designers name plastered over it. personally, had I been the designer, I would have been too embarrassed to advertise my name:D You say that the railings were not part of the original design, I find it incredible that a designer would expect the council to build a high open platform with no safety measures at all to prevent children, dogs or even adults from plunging to their death or serious injury, that says a lot about the designer! (P.S. Are dogs capable of commiting suicide??:p )

If you had any input into persuading the council to erect this Gayle, I STRONGLY suggest that you also persuade them to send someone up there to weld the 4 nuts in place. Armed with two spanners, I could make that a deathtrap for some unsuspecting tourist in a matter of seconds:eek: So much for Health and Safety!

While we are on the subject of Health and Safety, it needs a small area at the base of the steps so that people can "regain their feet" after climbing down the steps. At the moment, they step directly onto sloping grass. It was wet and cold when we went and my youngest daughter (12) lost her footing as she stepped onto the grass and knocked my camera out of my hand as she grasped at the first available thing (me) to prevent herself falling:eek:

I totally agree with you in your comment "As for the maintenance - it's terrible that they haven't taken any care of it! It's dirty and needs a good clean." If you check back on the discussions of a Panopticon for the coppice, many accyweb members were worried that P.B. and Hyndburn Council would not be willing to cover the cost of maintenance and that anything erected would quickly fall into disrepair. Blackburn obviously do not rate their Panopticon.......and neither would Hyndburn.

cashman 27-12-2006 21:52

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Hyndburn has missed out big style. The Burnley design has been seen by people far and wide, it is attracting huge good publicity for Burnley and is part of the many regeneration projects going on in the town. It is attracting more money for the town and is having a positive effect -------- sorry gayle thats complete Hogwash, i certainly dont feel ive missed out big style,and do not know anyone that does, and believe me ive asked a hell of a lot.cant speak about burnley,but i know lots of buisness people in blackburn who would argue with you about attracting more money.your into that and thats fair enough,but saying Hyndburn has missed out big style is way over the top.(just a point of view)

WillowTheWhisp 27-12-2006 22:18

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Before we set out on Sunday Busman told a friend that we were going Panopticon hunting. He'd never heard of panopticons but rather than let Busman explain to him he tried to hazzard a guess and came up with "pan" = "a wide view like in panoramic" and "optic" = something you can see" so I suppose he wasn't far wrong. The point is he has friends in Burnley and close ties with Burnley but hadn't seen or heard of the singing ringing tree.

Yes, a few people have gone up there to look at it, us included, but how does that bring money into the town? Can you even see Burnley from up there? It was impossible to tell the day we went.

Gayle made a classic point about "Colour Fields" in Blackburn needing a clean up but who is supposed to pay for the cleaning and maintenance? Surely that is bringing more expense to the Borough, not more revenue.

Those huge hoardings at each one are a bit of an eyesore. A signpost at key points wouldn't go amiss, like on on Revidge Rd and one pointing up Revidge Rd from Preston New Rd, and in Burnley one pointing up Rossendale Rd and one pointing up Crown Point Rd.

garinda 27-12-2006 23:11

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
A dog jumped off the battery in Corporation Park, and committed suicide?

Now that would be a piece of performance art worthy of Marcel Duchamp.

If anyone has it on video I suspect you could get Art Council funding to show it in any gallery in the UK, on a perpetual loop. :D

WillowTheWhisp 27-12-2006 23:16

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
A dog jumped off and died - you'd be hard pressed to prove it was suicide. Do we know that it was depressed at the time? Or was the balance of it's mind disturbed? Do we even know if it intended to jump off? Could it perhaps have run a little too quickly and failed to stop? Was it aware how far down the ground was? Maybe it didn't even realise there was a drop.

There is one heck of a drop and a nasty steep slope. All the more reason for a nice flat area at the base of the thing.

garinda 27-12-2006 23:22

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WillowTheWhisp (Post 357157)
A dog jumped off and died - you'd be hard pressed to prove it was suicide. Do we know that it was depressed at the time? Or was the balance of it's mind disturbed? Do we even know if it intended to jump off? Could it perhaps have run a little too quickly and failed to stop? Was it aware how far down the ground was? Maybe it didn't even realise there was a drop.

There is one heck of a drop and a nasty steep slope. All the more reason for a nice flat area at the base of the thing.

Perhaps it left a message, like the IRA prisoners used to on their cell walls.:eek:

Well if a Turner Prize winner can exhibit a painting using his excrement, and Gilbert and George can sell test tubes of their urine, a doggy pooh suicide letter could be considerd quite artistic.:D

Busman747 28-12-2006 00:28

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
http://i17.tinypic.com/46y16x0.gif

Ianto.W. 28-12-2006 00:39

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Gayle In its defence - the cannon batteries were in an appalling state of repair and a dog had committed suicide by jumping off one of them - they would have been knocked down for health and safety reasons. The Panopticon repaired them and has allowed them to be kept for a while longer.
Those cannon batteries had some history behind them Gayle, they were used at the seige of Sevastopol in the Crimean War, many of the streets in Blackburn were named after the battles in the Crimean War. I doubt if streets will be named after the Panopticon.

chav1 28-12-2006 04:17

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris (Post 357085)
What's all this "huge good publicity" it's attracting? I haven't seen any sign of it. And how is it attracting more money to the town and having a "positive effect"?

the photos speak for themselves cant you see the people queing up in their thousands with their pockets brimming with cash ready to spend

if it wasnt for willow and her family they would have probably been the only people this week if not year to actualy visit it from out of town, although i dare say they both have provided a nice spot for walkers to let their dogs urinate ( the thingies not willow and co lol )

ime fed up with arguing the obvious so in short all these things attract are vandals and dog urine

if a town wants to better its self it shoudlnt be relying on bribes to stick monstrocities in our beauty spots but should have a compatant council for starters that dosnt blow 10x the amount these people offer in bribes on getting broadway ALMOST right and mayor swearing in ceromonies at 50 thousand pounds a throw was it?

ime pretty sure the more knowledgable of our councils money wasting can throw a few more hundred thousand pounds worth of examples on money wasted that could have bettered our town

ahh cant beat a good old argument about the word i cant even remember how its spelt or even care to check how its spelt hell i cant even pronounce it :)

potomoa thingy - was that close ?

katex 28-12-2006 11:42

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
I think a really good money spinner for the Singing Ringing Tree would be to manufacture small models of same to put in your garden .. might drive yer neighbours crazy, but interesting nevertheless .. anybody wish to join me in this business proposition ?

Course it could be mistaken for the neighbour from hell you have just buried. :D

WillowTheWhisp 28-12-2006 13:41

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
There's probably some sort of copyright on it to stop us doing that. I wonder if they could rig one that produces energy at the same time? A singing ringing turbine? That could be handy.

Acrylic-bob 29-12-2006 14:33

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gayle (Post 357060)


As for Burnley, in my opinion it's beautiful, it makes a wonderful eerie noise and judging by the number of people that are always up there it is doing its job.


Errmmm, sorry to have to be the one to break this news to you Gayle, but has it ever occured to you that the hordes of folk at Crown Point might be there for some other reason than appreciation of "art"? The place has the reputation of being a rendezvous where both the straight and gay community meet for al fresco sexual encounters.

WillowTheWhisp 29-12-2006 14:38

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Anybody doing al fresco encountering in this weather needs their head examined!

garinda 29-12-2006 17:33

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
They'll need to take a rubber sheet to sit on, at the very least, it's lashing down.:eek:

katex 29-12-2006 17:37

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 357748)
They'll need to take a rubber sheet to sit on, at the very least, it's lashing down.:eek:

And the wind !!! Those pipes will surely be singing a great chorus today .. that'll put anyone of their stroke. :D

Busman747 29-12-2006 17:46

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WillowTheWhisp (Post 357713)
Anybody doing al fresco encountering in this weather needs their head examined!

Thats one way of putting it Willow :D

garinda 29-12-2006 17:50

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Perhaps they are all just conceptual artists up there.:D

http://people.clarkson.edu/~petersca/pictures/orgy.jpg

Shady McGough 29-12-2006 17:54

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
It seems to be the season of ill will regarding people who use their job to make this world a slightly better place. I have seen both Panopticons and think both are a worthwhile addition to both landscapes. It really rags me off that people on this website do virtually nothing but spout on and on about how awful everything is and how everything is a waste of public money blah blah blah.

Mid pennine's scheme to give us things that provoke discussion has apparantly worked, HOWEVER the vast majority of people who post on here just slag off Gayle and the panopticon schemes as it's an easy target.

If we didn't have things of this ilk the world would be a much duller and sadder place irrespective of whether you like them or not.

I, for one, will continue to support Mid Pennine (and Gayle) in their endeavours to make this world brighter.

cashman 29-12-2006 17:58

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Gayle does do a hell of a lot to brighten things up in the borough shady but wether you think its whinging or not, these are Crap and Waste of money.

Busman747 29-12-2006 18:33

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shady McGough (Post 357760)
I, for one, will continue to support Mid Pennine (and Gayle) in their endeavours to make this world brighter.

Good for you Shady, In the absence of Gayle, perhaps you would like to tell me what you find so good about these objects and why you consider them good value for money. It would be interesting to get favourable views from someone that does NOT profit from convincing the world that Panopticons are a good investment.

I try not to slag off Gayle, I have yet to meet her but she seems very likeable and charasmatic, love her threads on the accyweb.........but at the end of the day, she is trying to convince you, me and all the other accyweb members that the thousands of pounds spent on Panopticons are a good idea .....because thats her job! (or one of them)

WillowTheWhisp 29-12-2006 18:35

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
I don't slag off Gayle. I support some of her ideas and get involved in some or enjoy others but that doesn't mean have to like any of the panopticons if I don't like them and so far the only one which does anything for me is the SRT and sadly that didn't sing when we went up there and doesn't look as good as the original model which seemed to have this reachng up to the sky impression.

Wynonie Harris 29-12-2006 18:58

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shady McGough (Post 357760)
I have seen both Panopticons and think both are a worthwhile addition to both landscapes. It really rags me off that people on this website do virtually nothing but spout on and on about how awful everything is and how everything is a waste of public money blah blah blah.

Mid pennine's scheme to give us things that provoke discussion has apparantly worked, HOWEVER the vast majority of people who post on here just slag off Gayle and the panopticon schemes as it's an easy target.

They are easy targets because they are both ugly monstrosities that do nothing whatsoever to make the world a better place. They do represent wasted public money and they bring no advantage at all to the areas they are situated in. Sorry if we philistines upset you by saying this, but we're just expressing our democratic opinion.

KIPAX 29-12-2006 20:27

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
I have met Gayle.. done some photography for her .. I like her enthusiasm and I think she does a heck of a lot more for our community than all the moaners on here put together.. she works hard at what she does (I have seen) and a lot of people owe her for a lot of help she has given.. You wont find me having a pop at her.. quite the opposite

However.. the ponoptican is a no-no in my book because the only thing I have seen is stupid spaceships and other daft ideas to be put on the coppice and for me they would embaress us all.. I would be embearrssed to say I live here with a spaceship on the coppice. When it was in the papers it was all daft ideas... The tube thing burnley got doesn't sound all that bad... I would have perhaps supported the idea... But we seemed to have attracted all the loony stuff and now whenever its mentioned for accy its a flat no from me ..

I doubt gayle will take my views on the ponopticanthingy personally.. it's a pop at the daft ideas to put on the coppice nothing personal..

garinda 29-12-2006 23:26

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
I like the tree, and intensely dislike the Blackburn one.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion.

If people aren't able to taske criticism, they shouldn't put forward their art for public comment and discussion, but keep it to themselves.

Ianto.W. 30-12-2006 00:24

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Kipax, I have met Gayle.. done some photography for her .. I like her enthusiasm and I think she does a heck of a lot more for our community than all the moaners on here put together..
No one said Gayle did not contribute to the arts in Hyndburn or elswhere. Some of these 'moaners' on here have done a lot for the town also without seeking the added publictiy that goes with it. Furthermore these Panopticons make Andy Wharols Campbell's tins look good!

KIPAX 30-12-2006 00:32

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ianto.W. (Post 357930)
Some of these 'moaners' on here have done a lot for the town !


really... show me one... just one... lets see if your info is as big as your gob shall we... show me one of the people moaning in here who has done a lot for the town in the last 12 mths.. consistantly..

Ianto.W. 30-12-2006 00:39

Twelve months is a short time in a lifetime, I have no wish to engage in verbal fisticufs, just the right to express my views without your insults!

A coward does it with a kiss, a brave man with a sword.

WillowTheWhisp 30-12-2006 00:54

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ianto.W. (Post 357930)
Furthermore these Panopticons make Andy Wharols Campbell's tins look good!

I like those Campbell's soup cans.

KIPAX 30-12-2006 00:57

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ianto.W. (Post 357939)
A coward does it with a kiss, a brave man with a sword.


Hey you quoted me and took me to task.. wasnt you expecting a response?.. If you want to have a go at someone and them not reply then I suggest you pick on someone else. However feel free to take me to task anytime on my posts.. but have a little more than thoughts that pop into your head to backup what you post... :)

cashman 30-12-2006 00:58

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WillowTheWhisp (Post 357940)
I like those Campbell's soup cans.

yeh but would you buy the painting?;)

WillowTheWhisp 30-12-2006 00:59

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Possibly not an original but I used to have pop art prints in my younger days. :)

Ianto.W. 30-12-2006 01:00

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WillowTheWhisp (Post 357940)
I like those Campbell's soup cans.

I like what's in them better willow, there is no accounting for taste, each to his/her own.

KIPAX 30-12-2006 01:00

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WillowTheWhisp (Post 357947)
Possibly not an original but I used to have pop art prints in my younger days. :)

Your lucky.. I cant remember younger days :)

Ianto.W. 30-12-2006 01:03

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX (Post 357944)
Hey you quoted me and took me to task.. wasnt you expecting a response?.. If you want to have a go at someone and them not reply then I suggest you pick on someone else. However feel free to take me to task anytime on my posts.. but have a little more than thoughts that pop into your head to backup what you post... :)

If I offended you or anyone else I humbly appologise, there is no place in my life for enemies or ill will.

cashman 30-12-2006 01:03

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WillowTheWhisp (Post 357947)
Possibly not an original but I used to have pop art prints in my younger days. :)

me too but thats a differant matter i may have done then,but their long gone an i now have proper pictures lol

WillowTheWhisp 30-12-2006 01:11

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
So do I Cashman, many of my own creating. ;)

garinda 30-12-2006 09:58

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 357951)
i now have proper pictures lol

Awww thank you, one of my prints.:D

Uncle Mick 30-12-2006 12:26

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
I think the picture of the Blackburn Panoptican sums up the problem. Whether you like it or not it has to be kept in a decent state. The Blackburn one looks shabby and unloved and no doubt the council who`s job it is to provide maintenance for this sculpture will find better things to do with the towns money, which was always one of the reasons against anything on the Coppice, it would be just left to go to seed by the council.
Compare and contrast with the Angel Of The North, which has previously been used as a comparison. It needs minimum maintenance and was designed to weather as part of its attraction
Gayle does lots of fine work for the area and most of us don`t knock her just for the sake of it, only when we disagree with what is put forward, as is our democratic right. Remember Gayle is employed by Mid Pennine Arts and has to give a positive angle on these projects, because its her job!

Gayle 02-01-2007 17:29

Re: PanoptiCAN and PanoptiCAN'T
 
Thank you for the few of you who have come out in my defence. I do realise that when you're having a go at the Panopticons you're not having a go at me personally but there are times when I get a bit frustrated with it (I'm not complaining I know it's par for the course with a controversial project).

I get a bit frustrated because I'm not the project co-ordinator for the Panopticon project so it's not really up to me to take any credit (haha) or flak for it in some respects! However, I realise I'm the public face of the project in Hyndburn so it's only natural that you would talk to me about it.

Yes, Uncle Mick, I work for Mid Pennine Arts and yes, it's my job to be positive however, you've known me for a long time and when have I ever been the sort of person who would stand by things if I did not believe in them? You know me and you know that I have always been involved and interested in the arts so this is not some new thing that I have just latched on to. I am not just saying this because I have to but because it's my view.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:27.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com