Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   Councillor Kazi Siddique - fir for public office (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/councillor-kazi-siddique-fir-for-public-office-30030.html)

gondola 16-04-2007 15:13

Councillor Kazi Siddique - fir for public office
 
The conduct of Kazi Siddique as councillor is at best imperfect. Councillor Jones amongst others has questioned his credentials and dedication as councillor and as possible mayor going forward.

However it is not his dedication that ought to be questioned. It may be noteworthy but there are other far more pressing matters.

Allow me to elucidate thus enabling readers to make their own judgement.

Lilly 16-04-2007 15:34

Re: Councillor Kazi Siddique - fir for public office
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gondola (Post 411668)
The conduct of Kazi Siddique as councillor is at best imperfect. Councillor Jones amongst others has questioned his credentials and dedication as councillor and as possible mayor going forward.

However it is not his dedication that ought to be questioned. It may be noteworthy but there are other far more pressing matters.

Allow me to elucidate thus enabling readers to make their own judgement.


Fir???????

AccyJay 16-04-2007 15:36

Re: Councillor Kazi Siddique - fir for public office
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lilly (Post 411674)
Fir???????

I think it's supposed to say "fit".

:confused:

Acrylic-bob 16-04-2007 15:40

Re: Councillor Kazi Siddique - fir for public office
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gondola (Post 411668)
The conduct of Kazi Siddique as councillor is at best imperfect.
However it is not his dedication that ought to be questioned. It may be noteworthy but there are other far more pressing matters.

Allow me to elucidate thus enabling readers to make their own judgement.

OK, you are allowed to elucidate...we are waiting. Oh, and while you are at it, how about qualifying your remarks about the conduct of Cllr. Siddique? Or is this going to be another one of your "I know something that you don't know" exercises?

andrewb 16-04-2007 16:46

Re: Councillor Kazi Siddique - fir for public office
 
I do hope this does not turn in to another 30page thread with no actual substance what so ever.

flashy 16-04-2007 16:47

Re: Councillor Kazi Siddique - fir for public office
 
i thought fir was banned?

garinda 16-04-2007 17:06

Re: Councillor Kazi Siddique - fir for public office
 
Perhap's he's doing a Dickens, and just giving us one installment per week.

lancsdave 16-04-2007 17:06

Re: Councillor Kazi Siddique - fir for public office
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 411698)
I do hope this does not turn in to another 30page thread with no actual substance what so ever.

There was substance but it has been deleted presumably because nobody knows if it's truthful substance or rumour. :rolleyes:

WillowTheWhisp 16-04-2007 18:39

Re: Councillor Kazi Siddique - fir for public office
 
And now he's banned so we'll never know - which is probably just as well.

andrewb 16-04-2007 19:11

Re: Councillor Kazi Siddique - fir for public office
 
I don't really agree with him being banned, unless he was banned for reasons we don't know about.

Everyone has a right to voice their opinion don't they?

WillowTheWhisp 16-04-2007 19:17

Re: Councillor Kazi Siddique - fir for public office
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 411764)
I don't really agree with him being banned, unless he was banned for reasons we don't know about.

Everyone has a right to voice their opinion don't they?


Could well have been something slanderous which would have brought the board into disrepute.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 411706)
There was substance but it has been deleted presumably because nobody knows if it's truthful substance or rumour. :rolleyes:


andrewb 16-04-2007 19:23

Re: Councillor Kazi Siddique - fir for public office
 
Perhaps. But I dont think Roy is responsible for the content posted by other people.. although it would be a good idea to remove it if it was simply an accusation with no real proof.

E.g. if somebody posted racist content I dont think Roy could be prosecuted for it.

Margaret Pilkington 16-04-2007 19:26

Re: Councillor Kazi Siddique - fir for public office
 
No, maybe not...but it does bring the site into disrepute...especially if he is saying something that has no bearing in fact...just his own opinion.
Opinions are not fact.

andrewb 16-04-2007 19:39

Re: Councillor Kazi Siddique - fir for public office
 
Yes true. I suppose it depends what it was, but i'd always like to be able to air my opinions no matter what they were.. but I guess im not likely to make them without some sort of evidence because it doesn't go down too well, understandably!

Margaret Pilkington 16-04-2007 19:56

Re: Councillor Kazi Siddique - fir for public office
 
Cyfr...you can air your opinions and beliefs as long as they don't masquerade as facts.


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:35.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com