Originally Posted by blazey (Post 437660)

This got the highest mark in the art exam so how dare you tell me my work cannot be art.

Originally Posted by blazey (Post 437660)

Shall I expect you to be at the preview to give a speech on how the moderators and my teachers have no capabilities at recognising art?

Originally Posted by blazey (Post 437660)

Just because you don't like my style doesn't mean it isn't art.

Originally Posted by blazey (Post 437660)

How dare you. Who are you to say what is and isn't art?

Originally Posted by blazey (Post 437660)

Would you have even guessed the theme had it not been written for you to see?

Originally Posted by blazey (Post 438109)

I dont recall saying that. In fact I don't recall saying much directly to you.

Originally Posted by WillowTheWhisp

I would point you in the direction of the relevant post were it not for the fact that it has been removed (not at my request I hasten to add). I did question your comment at the time of posting but you chose not to reply - presumably because you had no facts to back up your ludicrous statement. Your memory seems to be failing you, a tragedy in one so young.

Originally Posted by yerself (Post 438231)

Whether or not I agree with Blazey I think you may owe her an apology. The relevant post has not been deleted it's here:http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/436326-post22.html

'Tis a tragedy of advancing years that one's memory begins to fail one.:rolleyes:

Originally Posted by yerself (Post 438231)

Whether or not I agree with Blazey I think you may owe her an apology. The relevant post has not been deleted it's here:http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/436326-post22.html

'Tis a tragedy of advancing years that one's memory begins to fail one.:rolleyes:

Originally Posted by Acrylic-bob (Post 438220)

Because, irrespective of the mark your teachers decided to award, merely daubing paint on a surface and ascribing some obtuse meaning to the marks made is not "art". It never was and it never will be. "Art" is what happens in the mind of the viewer when considering the work of a master of his chosen craft. "Art provokes powerful, unexpected and often disturbing connections in the mind of the viewer. Go and see the work of Mark Rothko in the Tate Gallery and then ask the attendant how people react to it. Cutting and pasting the work of others does not demonstrate anything, other than a certain facility with glue and scissors.


I am sure that your teacher is as capable of recognising "Art" as anyone else. Just as I am sure that your teacher is as capable of recognising dross in exactly the same way. The thing you must remember is that your teacher's continued employment, salary and pension depend on the grades acheived by students under his/her tuition. Regarding the "preview", thanks for the invitation but a quick look at my social diary reveals that I am scheduled to be sticking hot pins in my eyes that night. Sorry.


You are actually quite correct in assuming that don't like your "style". I don't like it because I have seen it done so much better by people who knew what they were doing. I think that you will find, if you could be bothered to do the research, that the aims and objectives of the current curriculum, as it applies to studies up to 'A' level, is to increase awareness of the history of the subject and to encourage some practical appreciation of the skills employed. I am sure that even Tessa Jowell would not be so arrogant as to claim that the period of study leading to the 'A' level equipped candidates to be accomplished and finished artists.


Errm, let me see...I hold O'level qualifications, A'level Qualifications, A Diploma of Higher Education, and a Degree, with honours, all in "Art" and related fields, I am also a member of the Association of Illustrators and I have earned a living from my work. I think that makes me more than qualified to offer a critique, don't you?


I assume from this comment that your teachers have not seen fit to introduce you to the concept of "Art" as a method of communication that transcends the barriers of culture and the written word. What is the point of attempting to communicate an idea in purely visual terms which nobody can appreciate unless you accompany it with reams of tortuous written explanation?

Originally Posted by Nickelson (Post 438236)

Willow in all fairness it was treacletart that said that to you. Not blazey , i see piltymon has been banned...

Originally Posted by davo69 (Post 438239)

what good news

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 438232)

i,m sure i read that comment a while before that was posted yerself, from somebody else, think the post your highlighting has quoted from it.:confused: