![]() |
Keep failing pupils back
Keep failing pupils back - Tories
So, the Conservatives propose that to improve literacy in secondary schools children found in their last year at Junior school to be struggling will be kept back for a year in a bid to ensure these children catch up. Excuse me? But I thought our children started school at the age of 5 and moved on to secondary school at 11 this surely gives the teachers at the junior school 6 years, (age 11 minus age 5=6 for anyone that should have been kept back), during which time they (teachers), should have the chance to notice that little Sarah is struggling with her reading etc. Therefore shouldn't more emphasis be placed on bringing her up to speed before the final year? Also, keeping a reluctant 12 year old back could cause disruption of the classroom for the struggling 11 year old that might have been passed as fit for progress to the secondary school if only their lessons hadn't been disturbed by the actions of some older children. |
Re: Keep failing pupils back
It would be a darned site easier if Primary schools could concentrate on teaching the basics first instead of all the additional curriculum which they can't possibly be any good at until they've learned to read and write.
|
Re: Keep failing pupils back
A clear example of politicians not having a clue, talk about handing the next election to Labour on a plate !!
|
Re: Keep failing pupils back
If a child is struggling the problem should be picked up very quickly and extra help arranged. It is a big thing moving up to secondary school without the added stigma of having been held back at junior school for an extra year. Do these people live in the real world? It would just give the bullies another excuse to havs a go!!!:confused:
|
Re: Keep failing pupils back
another glaring example of polititions being completely out of touch with reality.:rolleyes:
|
Re: Keep failing pupils back
Quote:
|
Re: Keep failing pupils back
Quote:
|
Re: Keep failing pupils back
Quote:
|
Re: Keep failing pupils back
Quote:
|
Re: Keep failing pupils back
It would help in the first place if there were extra-curricular classes for the non-English speakers in Reception classes to get them up to the required level by Year One and I fully agree that the problem should be tackled early on before it gets out of hand.
|
Re: Keep failing pupils back
At the end of the day any parent should know that their child is not progressing and should have got things moving before the child is ready to go to senior school. After all lots of kids have dyslexia and it doesn't hold them back. The key to the problem IMO is parents spotting any problems and getting them sorted!
|
Re: Keep failing pupils back
we already have problems with classes at
school being to large it would seem impractical to create a system whereby education of primary childer has to be extended we are already seeing teachers being told to extend school to include more sports and to cut the time of other subjects bottom lie is only so many hours in a day weeks years once again pie in the sky politics |
Re: Keep failing pupils back
Quote:
|
Re: Keep failing pupils back
Quote:
By the way, so far as large classes, I was part of the post war 'baby boomer's' and we had classes between 30 and 40 but we all knew we had to pay attention when a teacher spoke, perhaps something similar needs to be introduced? |
Re: Keep failing pupils back
i to was in the classrooms of the early 50s and we did
indeed pay attention to our teacher this was called respect both earned and taught no such thing exists now i myself as a parent sat down with my childer and we educated each other through the school years |
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:00. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com