Re: Poor Lady mcCartney
 

Sorry but why should she get any provision for herself, when she's quite capable of earning her own money. This should only have been about what the child gets & to hear Heather Mills ranting when she came out of court was unbelievable - the womans deranged! Only 35 grand a year for the little girl - what a shame, she should try getting nothing for years & then being 'awarded' a paltry 6 quid a week, then she might have summat to moan about.

Re: Poor Lady mcCartney
 

[QUOTE=AccyMad;547807]Sorry the womans deranged! QUOTE]


You can say that again
,,,,,,,,,,,17 k a night is enough for a life of luxury

Re: Poor Lady mcCartney
 

No Lilly .. without going into detail (yawn) .. been in that position and not at all jealous of Heather's settlement .. just feel good on her.

Still, if we are truthful, who wouldn't accept a proposal from Sir Paul (cummon ladies ... 5 secs to make up yer mind !).. :D
Not that he would ever ask me like .. too old for him, even though the same age .. but that's rich fellas for you.

Re: Poor Lady mcCartney
 

well if you think her daughter will be travelling B class on the money awarded her you are sounding like yer last sentence:D suprised at ya lilly, dont think many feel sorry fer McCartney i certainly dont:confused: but i think its a pretty safe bet many dislike that neurotic cow, who as the judge said lies, n was no evidence she had EVER donated the money to charity that she was claining.:rolleyes:

Re: Poor Lady mcCartney
 

Well, I reckon she was right to screw him for every penny she could (if you'll excuse the somewhat unfortunate choice of phrase). He deserves to pay through the nose for crimes against musical good taste.

After all, what's a little neurotic rant outside a courtroom compared to a lifetime of listening to "Simply having a wonderful Christmas" (or whatever it's called) every year...or, even worse, the bloody "Frog Song"? :eek:

Re: Poor Lady mcCartney
 

I don't like his music but I dislike her money grabbing and lying even more, at least his previous wife could knock out a decent veggie sausage roll, I would hate to get acquainted with any of Heather's "talents":eek:

Re: Poor Lady mcCartney
 

Re: Poor Lady mcCartney
 

And just what talents are those lindsay:cool::cool::cool::D

Re: Poor Lady mcCartney
 

None that can be repeated on a family forum Jaysay if the "allegations" of her colourful past are true. :rolleyes:

Re: Poor Lady mcCartney
 

I dont know how she's going to survive on 24.3 million and only 36k a year for the child, the poor things:rolleyes:

Re: Poor Lady mcCartney
 

She'll also get Child Benefit as well, which should make it a little easier for her.;)

:D

Re: Poor Lady mcCartney
 

Don't forget the blue badge too Rindy !

Re: Poor Lady mcCartney
 

Didn't make a big hit in the news over here ... but from what I read and what I saw on the Colonial Broadcasting Corp. news she seems like a real bitch .... I think that Eddie Murphy's video "Raw" (I think) .... the section of his show that deals with Johnny Carson's ex-wife's settlement .... sums it all up.

Re: Poor Lady mcCartney
 

I can't understand how anybody is defending her!
She moans that she can't cope with only 36,000 a year to bring up a child!
How many people do you know that have that sort of money and yet still get by?
She is a greedy,manipulative,money-grabbing,good for nothing lying cow end of and i think she gives women everywhere a bad name.

Re: Poor Lady mcCartney
 

Paul McCartney has a duty to keep Heather and Beatrice in the manner to which they have grown accustomed. £36,000 p/a is a reasonable amount in their lives although it sounds like a lot to us.