![]() |
Re: Nosmo King
Quote:
Er! Do why still have mental health units? |
Re: Nosmo King
Quote:
Memo to burglars. Have a fag whilst you are plying your trade. The police won’t touch you for at least an hour. Imagine the scene – a guy is doing a bit of DIY, slips and gashes his wrist. Blood is pumping out and a paramedic pokes his head round the door and smells the fag that wife gave him to calm him down a bit. “Sorry guv I can’t come in and treat you. You will have to bleed to death.” I think that the word CRACKPOT is a suitable description. |
Re: Nosmo King
Quote:
|
Re: Nosmo King
Quote:
By the way, one of the early signs is getting your words muddled.:D |
Re: Nosmo King
Quote:
|
Re: Nosmo King
Quote:
|
Re: Nosmo King
Quote:
Personally I'd let the elderly smoke themselves to death, it's their lives and they might as well live out their days as they wish as long as it isnt harming anyone else. |
Re: Nosmo King
Would just add that not everyone in a care home is elderly.
It’s just the erosion of everyone’s rights picking up momentum. The elderly and/or infirm are hardly going to kick up a fuss :( |
Re: Nosmo King
I can't believe they would do this. You are allowed to smoke in your own home....and a care home IS there own home......hmmmmm I don't see the difference.
When the smoking ban came in, our residents were allowed to smoke in the SMOKERS lounge..... even family were allowed to, because its classed as THERE OWN HOME and family are guests. Relatives that didn't have a smoking Resident, were not allowed to smoke In the home. |
Re: Nosmo King
Quote:
Smokers can go into their own rooms if need be, or outside. Its just like at university where all the accomodation is non-smoking, and whilst there is smoking accomodation, you still have to smoke within your own room and not out in the corridors. I dont think anything particularly unjust is being done to smokers by enforcing these kind of rules. |
Re: Nosmo King
None of this doesn’t change the fact that this government as lost it direction or as it? If the balance of the population shifts in favour of the non smoker than an ever encroaching ban will “in their minds” increase their share of the non smoking vote.
What I don’t like is the fact that there is very little choice in terms of an alternative government. In respect of the Health and Safety aspects it’s the responsibility of the employer/employee combination to reduce risk not hide behind this non entry bull****. But what really gets me is that the Human Rights Acts protects terrorist, criminals, offenders, illegal immigrants and other non tax paying scrounging bastards from being named yet someone who may have fought for there country or worked all their lives can’t have a fag in peace. |
Re: Nosmo King
Quote:
Quote:
I just KNEW that you wouldn’t be able to resist having a poke at me in your inimitable childish way. It would have been obvious to an amoeba that it couldn’t have been a typo so it had to be deliberate. But you being so full of crap and your own self importance you just had to have a dig and made a complete and utter fool of yourself, leaving people in no doubt who the obnoxious prat is on this forum. I think that your post signature is quite appropriate in this instance.:rofl38: |
Re: Nosmo King
Quote:
|
Re: Nosmo King
Quote:
Meanwhile we cannot deny prisoners their illegal drugs because that is against their human rights! |
Re: Nosmo King
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:06. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com