Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   Post Office Closures (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/post-office-closures-37825.html)

blazey 20-03-2008 11:43

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by onlyme (Post 548757)
cant wait till your gone 80 and trying to get on a crowded bus with a load of boisterous kids. In fact, really cant wait till you grow up, to be brutally honest

Yes blame kids, because how many kids are on the bus on their own in the kind of group there'd have to be for that...

ALSO, whilst we're on it, kids don't tend to sit at the front in the seats reserved for the elderly, only when the bus is full up.

Why is it that people always blame the youth? I very rarely see children on the bus full stop unless its the early morning run, and that can easily be avoided with buses running as often as they do.

And if you think thats brutal, you must be seriously lacking strength of mind. What sort of a come back is grow up?

onlyme 20-03-2008 12:25

Re: Post Office Closures
 
my god, would love to know what kind of buses you travel on. Have ya never tried Accy after school has just finished. Yes, kids get a negative press, but at the end of the day, a group of young lads can easily intimidate a lot of people, let alone the elderley, whether justified or not.

It p*sses me off that theres an old lady who lives round the corner from me that wont open her door after dark, and even blokes it with a chair as kids hang around the shops nr her. No one should live with that fear. And why the hell should people have to avoid buses at a certain time????

The grow up comment, purely made as you seem to live in your own idealistic child. Usually as you grow older, it becomes apparent that life is not just black and white, as you seem to view it. For someone that harps on about students and the fact that fat people annoy you, you seem to have a very immature opinion

WalkOnBRFC 20-03-2008 12:27

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 548783)
Amen to that onlyme, our Graham must get writers cramp every time he comes on here, but then why use 1 word when 30 will do if your trying to baffle people with B*** S***:D

Do you ever have anything nice to say? :rolleyes:

emamum 20-03-2008 12:28

Re: Post Office Closures
 
I would say that is usually the kids that are sitting in the bay reserved for prams and wheelchairs but we arent allowed to take prams on buses according to Blazeys law!

onlyme 20-03-2008 12:29

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WalkOnBRFC (Post 548904)
Do you ever have anything nice to say? :rolleyes:

Was that aimed at me, seeing as he was agreeing with my post? lol

blazey 20-03-2008 12:33

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Firstly, I said it was wrong to whinge about 3 wheeled prams when they were only disallowed for health and safety policy, which have now been altered.

Secondly, most youngsters run straight to the back to sit on the back seats or the seats facing each other. Anyone who has ever used a school bus will know that on a single decker, these are like the Alpha seats of the bus, and on a double decker that status moves to being upstairs.

It's all about not being seen by the driver, and these seats are what used to be the ones hidden best from view until CCTV was introduced on buses.

You forget that with my childish attitude and age I am still old enough to be one of these so called intimidating youths, at least according to the average age of the oswaldtwistle chav.

onlyme 20-03-2008 12:38

Re: Post Office Closures
 
at the end of the day, everyone is at an age where they can be intimidating, dependant on how they are acting.

The reason i used school kids and youngsters as an example is purely as the nation does have such a bad view of these youngsters, and for an old lady who is having happy slapping images thrown across her tv screen at every opportunity, she will at the very least, be nervous.

How did we get onto this from post office closures????

blazey 20-03-2008 12:41

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by onlyme (Post 548917)
at the end of the day, everyone is at an age where they can be intimidating, dependant on how they are acting.

The reason i used school kids and youngsters as an example is purely as the nation does have such a bad view of these youngsters, and for an old lady who is having happy slapping images thrown across her tv screen at every opportunity, she will at the very least, be nervous.

How did we get onto this from post office closures????

Because I said post offices should just be required to be within reasonable range of public transport and not walking distance.

Either way she'll have to walk somewhere whether its to the bus stop or to the post office... if anything an elderly lady would be at more risk from assault OFF the bus than on it.

Also, people don't help the stereotypes of young people when they use it as examples like that. You tell a teen that they are something and they tend to act that way. For anyone watching Eastenders right now, you will be able to see just that happening with lovely Lucy Beale.

g jones 20-03-2008 13:43

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 548783)
Amen to that onlyme, our Graham must get writers cramp every time he comes on here, but then why use 1 word when 30 will do if your trying to baffle people with B*** S***:D

I take it your not happy with which way the argument is going then John????!! :mad::mad:

WalkOnBRFC 20-03-2008 13:48

Re: Post Office Closures
 
I like this photo it's much better than the last one :D

WalkOnBRFC 20-03-2008 14:21

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by onlyme (Post 548910)
Was that aimed at me, seeing as he was agreeing with my post? lol

..... No :)

andrewb 20-03-2008 14:25

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WalkOnBRFC (Post 548995)
..... No :)

Can I ask why it was aimed at Jaysay but not at onlyme when Jaysay was agreeing with onlyme's post?

WalkOnBRFC 20-03-2008 15:37

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 548997)
Can I ask why it was aimed at Jaysay but not at onlyme when Jaysay was agreeing with onlyme's post?

If you must be nosey.. Jaysay refered to it as 'baffling with B*** S***' whether he was referring to his grammar or his actual comments I'm not sure but it didn't seem very nice :D People are entitled to their opinions but there's ways of saying things and ways of not if you disagree.

g jones 20-03-2008 15:39

Re: Post Office Closures
 
2 Attachment(s)
see attachments - thought they make interesting reading about what is happening behind he scenes?

Loz 20-03-2008 16:14

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Blazey when you do eventually grow up and enter the real world earning a wage etc.. and paying bills then i reckon your attitude will change very quickly.
I hate going on a bus full of schoolkids i find it very intimidating so god knows how eldrly people must feel.

andrewb 20-03-2008 16:26

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 549056)
see attachments - thought they make interesting reading about what is happening behind he scenes?

Interesting because Greg Pope wasn't even at the debate in parliament he was posting on Accringtonweb at the time. Whilst watching the debate I noticed an awful lot of ideas put forward that would allow the post office to become manageable without huge closures. So maybe if he was taking part he might have voted in favour of saving our post offices as there were a variety of options put forward.

Gordon Prentice the Labour MP for Pendle managed to look at the issue, realise that suspending the post offices to look at them again was a good idea, and voted with the Conservatives (God forbid).

jaysay 20-03-2008 16:36

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WalkOnBRFC (Post 548904)
Do you ever have anything nice to say? :rolleyes:

yes to the right people

jaysay 20-03-2008 16:38

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 548974)
I take it your not happy with which way the argument is going then John????!! :mad::mad:

no you just bore the tits of me Graham:rolleyes:

jaysay 20-03-2008 16:42

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 549056)
see attachments - thought they make interesting reading about what is happening behind he scenes?

Well at least we know who's writing your script Graham

onlyme 20-03-2008 17:30

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 548997)
Can I ask why it was aimed at Jaysay but not at onlyme when Jaysay was agreeing with onlyme's post?

I was wondering the same. At the end of the day Jaysay was just coining a well known phrase thats pretty standard in todays language.

Besides, I might have said similar, except me dad comes on here, and even at the age of 32, I try not to swear in front of him lmao

onlyme 20-03-2008 17:36

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 549056)
see attachments - thought they make interesting reading about what is happening behind he scenes?

Wow, this is soooooo James Bond pmsl

WalkOnBRFC 20-03-2008 18:08

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by onlyme (Post 549131)
I was wondering the same. At the end of the day Jaysay was just coining a well known phrase thats pretty standard in todays language.

Besides, I might have said similar, except me dad comes on here, and even at the age of 32, I try not to swear in front of him lmao

Well Im sure he can speak for himself. I must've read it wrong sorry :D

garinda 20-03-2008 18:23

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Why didn't Peter Britcliffe just e-mail Greg Pope, his question?

It would have saved us, the council tax payers, the cost of the stationery, and postage.

I believe council letters go through their own franking machine, so it's not even as if he was keeping his local Post Office in business.

onlyme 20-03-2008 18:27

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WalkOnBRFC (Post 549163)
Well Im sure he can speak for himself. I must've read it wrong sorry :D

Sorry, wasnt trying to cause a row or anything....

***goes back under her stone*** ;)

Sorry!

Lilly 20-03-2008 21:07

Re: Post Office Closures
 
I see that Greg Pope has voted in favour of the closures today.

How Labour MPs voted on post office closures - Telegraph

Wasn't he campaigning locally to keep them open, or have I dreamt that? :confused:

cashman 20-03-2008 21:09

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lilly (Post 549302)
I see that Greg Pope has voted in favour of the closures today.

How Labour MPs voted on post office closures - Telegraph

Wasn't he campaigning locally to keep them open, or have I dreamt that? :confused:

why am i not suprised at that.:( really caring.

lancsdave 20-03-2008 21:13

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 549177)
Why didn't Peter Britcliffe just e-mail Greg Pope, his question?

It would have saved us, the council tax payers, the cost of the stationery, and postage.

I believe council letters go through their own franking machine, so it's not even as if he was keeping his local Post Office in business.

Maybe it was the extensive reasons given for keeping the post offices open that PB thought a letter was more appropriate for a letter. E-mails are usually better kept for brief questions :D

garinda 20-03-2008 22:44

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 549310)
Maybe it was the extensive reasons given for keeping the post offices open that PB thought a letter was more appropriate for a letter. E-mails are usually better kept for brief questions :D

Though ironically by using the council's own mailing servive, his letter will have never been anywhere near a Post Office, local or not.;)

garinda 20-03-2008 22:45

Re: Post Office Closures
 
...and we've all paid for it.

jaysay 21-03-2008 05:55

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 549371)
...and we've all paid for it.

No comment on Greg voting for post office closures then Rindi:hidewall:

g jones 21-03-2008 07:27

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 549400)
No comment on Greg voting for post office closures then Rindi:hidewall:

I think Greg's response was very good. Not entirely my view but one that can be respected. Peter's letter. Well it's just as Greg said.

Peter got 12,000 votes and Greg 18,000 at the last General election. For me the letters reflect people's view of both candidates. Peter has his supporters, Greg has his. Peter clearly needs to be a lot more committed to Hyndburn, and stop being dishonest if he is to seriously do a better job than Greg.

In his leaders column this week Peter was at it again telling more lies about Labour*. He will never get past 12,000 votes IMHO whilst he has that attitude.

* Labour tabled on simple budget amendment - Council Tax 2% - it was defeated and the Conservatives voted through their 5% rise instead. The Labour 40 ideas - many cost little or nothing, policy reviews, new code of conduct for Councillors, changing all of the committee structure to stop the sleaze and corruption. All of it was within a smaller budget than the Conservatives.

On the spending side, most or nearly all them involved the spending of an extra £4m the Government has given Hyndburn - not current expenditure. Peter knew this because I told him but thought he could get some extra votes by misleading the public. Deja Vu every year. Last year he made up scare stories about Rubbish Tax and Car Parking Charges. It's funny at times (when it's not depressing). Like living in an African banana republic, no matter what the dictator does he get's elected.

g jones 21-03-2008 07:33

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 549400)
No comment on Greg voting for post office closures then Rindi:hidewall:


and jaysay......what's your answer (forget others - you've got a big mouth so let's hear it)... public subsidy???????? or market forces???????.....:hidewall::hidewall::hidewall:

g jones 21-03-2008 08:04

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Heh Jaysay... given all the noise your lot are making on this here in Hyndburn... how come Hyndburn Council is not one the Councils that has applied ?????? :theband::theband:

Is Clr Britcliffe committing the Council to spending up to £72,000 (and beyond with recruitment of new postmasters) propping up the 4 closures? You said Tories will save them .... how??? You have an opportunity to make a positive decision and back up your words. :hidewall:

COUNCILS GIVEN GREEN LIGHT TO SAVE POST OFFICES
Post Office managers must co-operate fully with innovative plans by local councils to save their local branches from closure, ministers said today. More than 50 councils now want to save threatened branches, offering rescue packages of £18,000 per branch over three years from council tax receipts. Sir Simon Milton (Conservative), chairman of the LGA, was quoted: “It is a huge step in the right direction that the Minister has instructed Post Office Limited to enter into discussions with councils who have put forward proposals to save some of their local branches.
Telegraph p8, Guardian p14, FT p2, Express p2
MP rebellion fails to stop post office closures - Telegraph

andrewb 21-03-2008 08:43

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 549426)
I think Greg's response was very good. Not entirely my view but one that can be respected. Peter's letter. Well it's just as Greg said.

Peter got 12,000 votes and Greg 18,000 at the last General election. For me the letters reflect people's view of both candidates. Peter has his supporters, Greg has his. Peter clearly needs to be a lot more committed to Hyndburn, and stop being dishonest if he is to seriously do a better job than Greg.

In his leaders column this week Peter was at it again telling more lies about Labour*. He will never get past 12,000 votes IMHO whilst he has that attitude.

* Labour tabled on simple budget amendment - Council Tax 2% - it was defeated and the Conservatives voted through their 5% rise instead. The Labour 40 ideas - many cost little or nothing, policy reviews, new code of conduct for Councillors, changing all of the committee structure to stop the sleaze and corruption. All of it was within a smaller budget than the Conservatives.

On the spending side, most or nearly all them involved the spending of an extra £4m the Government has given Hyndburn - not current expenditure. Peter knew this because I told him but thought he could get some extra votes by misleading the public. Deja Vu every year. Last year he made up scare stories about Rubbish Tax and Car Parking Charges. It's funny at times (when it's not depressing). Like living in an African banana republic, no matter what the dictator does he get's elected.

I see you have failed to respond to my post that suggest Mr Pope might have known what the Conservatives and Liberals were suggesting if he actually attended the debate in Parliament on Wednesday rather than posting here at the time.

I would at least expect you to have some form of clue about what is going on in the world of Politics. The last general election was not even fought by Peter Britcliffe in Hyndburn. You seem to believe that the whole election was based on a cult of personality, he's just an ordinary man, you might want to think about policy at elections because thats usually what people care about.

You bat on about these 40 uncosted items, I'd like to know what they were if we are to believe your story.

It isn't however very belivable right now, because you talk about corruption, you talk about sleeze, you talk about misleading people, then you go ahead and tell us the Conservatives are raising tax by 5% when its actually 3.7%

Last time we had a Labour council we were £2million in debt, now we're 500k in the positive. Are you sure 2% increase is well costed and isn't just for votes?

Is it any wonder people don't trust Labour with the council when you'd be in charge?

andrewb 21-03-2008 08:55

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 549431)
Heh Jaysay... given all the noise your lot are making on this here in Hyndburn... how come Hyndburn Council is not one the Councils that has applied ?????? :theband::theband:

Is Clr Britcliffe committing the Council to spending up to £72,000 (and beyond with recruitment of new postmasters) propping up the 4 closures? You said Tories will save them .... how??? You have an opportunity to make a positive decision and back up your words. :hidewall:


Lets just get the figures straight, that's £72,000 over three years so £24,000 a year, what happens after the 3 years? The Conservatives proposals revolved around turning post offices into profitable businesses and there were a range of ideas debated. The Government need to make these changes so that sub-post offices can compete and they seem reluctant to so far (hence closing them all as seemingly a first option). Which means the council have to run them at a loss if they're not allowed to try and make them profitable. I don't know the full details of the budgets, but if budgets have already been drawn up, what would you cut from your 2% tax budget to fund this?

jaysay 21-03-2008 09:08

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 549426)
I think Greg's response was very good. Not entirely my view but one that can be respected. Peter's letter. Well it's just as Greg said.

Peter got 12,000 votes and Greg 18,000 at the last General election. For me the letters reflect people's view of both candidates. Peter has his supporters, Greg has his. Peter clearly needs to be a lot more committed to Hyndburn, and stop being dishonest if he is to seriously do a better job than Greg.

In his leaders column this week Peter was at it again telling more lies about Labour*. He will never get past 12,000 votes IMHO whilst he has that attitude.

* Labour tabled on simple budget amendment - Council Tax 2% - it was defeated and the Conservatives voted through their 5% rise instead. The Labour 40 ideas - many cost little or nothing, policy reviews, new code of conduct for Councillors, changing all of the committee structure to stop the sleaze and corruption. All of it was within a smaller budget than the Conservatives.

On the spending side, most or nearly all them involved the spending of an extra £4m the Government has given Hyndburn - not current expenditure. Peter knew this because I told him but thought he could get some extra votes by misleading the public. Deja Vu every year. Last year he made up scare stories about Rubbish Tax and Car Parking Charges. It's funny at times (when it's not depressing). Like living in an African banana republic, no matter what the dictator does he get's elected.

Yap, Yap, Yap, Yap, Yap, Yap, Yap

jaysay 21-03-2008 09:09

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 549427)
and jaysay......what's your answer (forget others - you've got a big mouth so let's hear it)... public subsidy???????? or market forces???????.....:hidewall::hidewall::hidewall:

Yap, Yap, Yap, Yap, Yap, Yap, Yap, Yap,

jaysay 21-03-2008 09:10

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 549431)
Heh Jaysay... given all the noise your lot are making on this here in Hyndburn... how come Hyndburn Council is not one the Councils that has applied ?????? :theband::theband:

Is Clr Britcliffe committing the Council to spending up to £72,000 (and beyond with recruitment of new postmasters) propping up the 4 closures? You said Tories will save them .... how??? You have an opportunity to make a positive decision and back up your words. :hidewall:

COUNCILS GIVEN GREEN LIGHT TO SAVE POST OFFICES
Post Office managers must co-operate fully with innovative plans by local councils to save their local branches from closure, ministers said today. More than 50 councils now want to save threatened branches, offering rescue packages of £18,000 per branch over three years from council tax receipts. Sir Simon Milton (Conservative), chairman of the LGA, was quoted: “It is a huge step in the right direction that the Minister has instructed Post Office Limited to enter into discussions with councils who have put forward proposals to save some of their local branches.
Telegraph p8, Guardian p14, FT p2, Express p2
MP rebellion fails to stop post office closures - Telegraph

Yawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwn

panther 21-03-2008 09:12

Re: Post Office Closures
 
you should go to bed if ya tired jaysay........:D

jaysay 21-03-2008 09:50

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by panther (Post 549447)
you should go to bed if ya tired jaysay........:D

Its just Cllr Jones that sends me to sleep panther:rolleyes:

garinda 21-03-2008 10:11

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 549400)
No comment on Greg voting for post office closures then Rindi:hidewall:


Since it's apparent to anyone who has bothered to read this thread, that I'm not in favour of unprofitable Post Offices being supoorted with tax payer's money ad infinitum, I didn't think a comment is necessary, but if you insist...

Well done Greg Pope, for doing what you believe to be right, and not listening to the hysterical mob.

That do you?

jaysay 21-03-2008 10:16

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 549465)
Since it's apparent to anyone who has bothered to read this thread, that I'm not in favour of unprofitable Post Offices being supoorted with tax payer's money ad infinitum, I didn't think a comment is necessary, but if you insist...

Well done Greg Pope, for doing what you believe to be right, and not listening to the hysterical mob.

That do you?

Never expected you to say out else Rindi, :rolleyes:

garinda 21-03-2008 10:21

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 549468)
Never expected you to say out else Rindi, :rolleyes:


So the reason you asked was?

Strange all these Conservatives shouting that they want public money to be used to keep unprofitable businesses open, when for nearly twenty years Mrs Thatcher insisted just the opposite, when she privatised so many other services and industries, because she said they were haemorrhaging tax payer's money.

garinda 21-03-2008 10:27

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Unlike a lot of people in this thread, I have no political axe to grind.

I am not, and never have been, a member of any political party.

I just say what I think to be right, and in this case I think those that voted with the government were right.

onlyme 21-03-2008 11:34

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 549431)
Heh Jaysay... given all the noise your lot are making on this here in Hyndburn... how come Hyndburn Council is not one the Councils that has applied ?????? :theband::theband:

Is Clr Britcliffe committing the Council to spending up to £72,000 (and beyond with recruitment of new postmasters) propping up the 4 closures? You said Tories will save them .... how??? You have an opportunity to make a positive decision and back up your words. :hidewall:

COUNCILS GIVEN GREEN LIGHT TO SAVE POST OFFICES
Post Office managers must co-operate fully with innovative plans by local councils to save their local branches from closure, ministers said today. More than 50 councils now want to save threatened branches, offering rescue packages of £18,000 per branch over three years from council tax receipts. Sir Simon Milton (Conservative), chairman of the LGA, was quoted: “It is a huge step in the right direction that the Minister has instructed Post Office Limited to enter into discussions with councils who have put forward proposals to save some of their local branches.
Telegraph p8, Guardian p14, FT p2, Express p2
MP rebellion fails to stop post office closures - Telegraph

Maybe I'm missing something, but why the personal vendetta against Jaysay??? Other voting members of public are also adding to this thread, but you only seem to show an interest in his posts...

...Do the rest of us not matter?

cashman 21-03-2008 13:53

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by onlyme (Post 549515)
Maybe I'm missing something, but why the personal vendetta against Jaysay??? Other voting members of public are also adding to this thread, but you only seem to show an interest in his posts...

...Do the rest of us not matter?

Probably cos there both Members of opposite Parties, usually helps:D;)

jaysay 21-03-2008 13:57

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by onlyme (Post 549515)
Maybe I'm missing something, but why the personal vendetta against Jaysay??? Other voting members of public are also adding to this thread, but you only seem to show an interest in his posts...

...Do the rest of us not matter?

If Cllr Jones won't answer you onlyme, i'll try to. If you don't know I'm well known for being a member of the Tory Party, and was very much involved with Council Leader Peter Britcliffe, as his campaign manager and his work in Ossy. However due to very poor health I stepped down from front line politics some seven years ago, but the lovely Graham seems to think I'm talking to PB every day, the truth is I have not seen Peter since May Day last year, and have talked to him around 5 times since then, mainly about our support of BRFC as we are both lie long fans. The bottom line is i'm not really interested politically any more, but some of the tripe spouted on her by our Graham, justs tends to turn the clock back a little. Graham thinks he is Mr. Infallible, but to my way of thinking there was only ever one person who was worthy of that title and its around 2008 years today since the Romans crucified him on Calvery. After that onlyme if you can work out where Cllr. Jones is coming from please let me know, I would find it very enlightening:confused:

WalkOnBRFC 21-03-2008 14:03

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by onlyme (Post 549515)
Maybe I'm missing something, but why the personal vendetta against Jaysay??? Other voting members of public are also adding to this thread, but you only seem to show an interest in his posts...

...Do the rest of us not matter?

You can't always get on with everyone but they both need to grow up with petty squabbles and one liners here and there.. Jaysay is just as bad so he needn't pretend to be whiter than white. If you didn't reply to each others posts and agree to disagree then maybe that might be a start. Our both respect that you both have different opinions.

onlyme 21-03-2008 14:35

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 549589)
If Cllr Jones won't answer you onlyme, i'll try to. If you don't know I'm well known for being a member of the Tory Party, and was very much involved with Council Leader Peter Britcliffe, as his campaign manager and his work in Ossy. However due to very poor health I stepped down from front line politics some seven years ago, but the lovely Graham seems to think I'm talking to PB every day, the truth is I have not seen Peter since May Day last year, and have talked to him around 5 times since then, mainly about our support of BRFC as we are both lie long fans. The bottom line is i'm not really interested politically any more, but some of the tripe spouted on her by our Graham, justs tends to turn the clock back a little. Graham thinks he is Mr. Infallible, but to my way of thinking there was only ever one person who was worthy of that title and its around 2008 years today since the Romans crucified him on Calvery. After that onlyme if you can work out where Cllr. Jones is coming from please let me know, I would find it very enlightening:confused:



Ahhhhhhhhh. Now I understand and must apologise for being a little 'numb' on the backgrounds lol

jaysay 21-03-2008 14:41

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WalkOnBRFC (Post 549591)
You can't always get on with everyone but they both need to grow up with petty squabbles and one liners here and there.. Jaysay is just as bad so he needn't pretend to be whiter than white. If you didn't reply to each others posts and agree to disagree then maybe that might be a start. Our both respect that you both have different opinions.

I ain't going to reply to young Graham again Walkon, I'll leave him to the young Cyfr:hitting8:

cashman 21-03-2008 16:28

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 549606)
I ain't going to reply to young Graham again Walkon, I'll leave him to the young Cyfr:hitting8:

ohh thats a great pity the dustups are cashy fodder.:D:D

WalkOnBRFC 21-03-2008 16:53

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 549606)
I ain't going to reply to young Graham again Walkon, I'll leave him to the young Cyfr:hitting8:

I'm sure Graham will cope :rolleyes:

jaysay 21-03-2008 16:57

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WalkOnBRFC (Post 549643)
I'm sure Graham will cope :rolleyes:

Don't put your shirt on it walkon, why do you think I'm retiring so gracefully:D

WalkOnBRFC 21-03-2008 17:03

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 549645)
Don't put your shirt on it walkon, why do you think I'm retiring so gracefully:D

Well I'm glad you feel like you've achieved something.. like I said I'm sure Graham will cope :rolleyes:

onlyme 21-03-2008 18:11

Re: Post Office Closures
 
He may cope, but to be honest, his posts on here has changed my voting tendencies.

Probs not the way he wanted either

garinda 21-03-2008 18:27

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Received via pm, from Cyfr.

Sorry for quoting your message here, but I'm not carrying on the debate here and also by pm.

[Quote Cyfr/]Thatcher privatised industries that were still going to exist after privatisation, only with lower costs to the customer because of competition.

The post office isn't like that though is it, it's important to many people, perhaps most important in more rural areas.

I'm not advocating running the network at huge dramatic lost to the tax payer, but it seems sensible to at least give the sub-post offices a chance to compete. I do think we should be subsidising the rurals, because they don't have alternatives in the same way we do. The post office network was still profitable under the Tories. Labour took various aspects away from them (such as the whole pensions by DD), which is good, but they didn't look at it from a business point of view and say "Well if we're taking that away, maybe we should let them compete in other areas".

If at the end of the day we can't turn them around into profits (the urban ones), then fair enough we should look at closure, but it almost seems like they've not even looked at the other options before deciding to close them.

Another notable point is that when post offices close, surrounding businesses tend to suffer too, theres a study about it but I can't find it as it was just referenced in the debate. So the economic impact is more than just getting our money back from the post office, as we will lose tax elsewhere.[quote/]

Dramatic loss?

Four million pounds per week, to me is a dramatic loss, especially as the figure is constantly rising, and will continure to do so, as more and more people chose to shop for their services eleswhere.

andrewb 21-03-2008 18:46

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 549706)
Received via pm, from Cyfr.

Sorry for quoting your message here, but I'm not carrying on the debate here and also by pm.

[Quote Cyfr/]Thatcher privatised industries that were still going to exist after privatisation, only with lower costs to the customer because of competition.

The post office isn't like that though is it, it's important to many people, perhaps most important in more rural areas.

I'm not advocating running the network at huge dramatic lost to the tax payer, but it seems sensible to at least give the sub-post offices a chance to compete. I do think we should be subsidising the rurals, because they don't have alternatives in the same way we do. The post office network was still profitable under the Tories. Labour took various aspects away from them (such as the whole pensions by DD), which is good, but they didn't look at it from a business point of view and say "Well if we're taking that away, maybe we should let them compete in other areas".

If at the end of the day we can't turn them around into profits (the urban ones), then fair enough we should look at closure, but it almost seems like they've not even looked at the other options before deciding to close them.

Another notable point is that when post offices close, surrounding businesses tend to suffer too, theres a study about it but I can't find it as it was just referenced in the debate. So the economic impact is more than just getting our money back from the post office, as we will lose tax elsewhere.[quote/]

Dramatic loss?

Four million pounds per week, to me is a dramatic loss, especially as the figure is constantly rising, and will continue to do so, as more and more people chose to shop for their services elsewhere.

So what about looking at them to see if we can make them profitable by having less restrictions? Rather than just immediately looking at closure.

As for figures, there are so many brandished around I have no idea which are correct in terms of how much money they're actually losing :p

garinda 21-03-2008 18:54

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 549721)
So what about looking at them to see if we can make them profitable by having less restrictions? Rather than just immediately looking at closure.

As for figures, there are so many brandished around I have no idea which are correct in terms of how much money they're actually losing :p

The figure, quoted by all sides of the political specrtum, and uncontested, is four million pounds per day to keep the unprofitable Post Offices afloat.

I'd also be against public money being used to bolster other unprofitabe businesses, such as pubs, which many people also see as being at the heart of their communities.

It's a shame when they close, but market forces, and the numbers of people actually using them, decide what is, and what isn't, a viable business proposition.

cashman 21-03-2008 18:57

Re: Post Office Closures
 
i think greg pope, jack straw n the other labour MPs who didn't mind having photos taken to keep post offices open, then voted with the government to close em, should hang their heads in shame,from my standpoint it was totally spineless, and the main reason i washed my hands of the labour party, :(

andrewb 21-03-2008 19:03

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 549731)
The figure, quoted by all sides of the political specrtum, and uncontested, is four million pounds per day to keep the unprofitable Post Offices afloat.

I'd also be against public money being used to bolster other unprofitabe businesses, such as pubs, which many people also see as being at the heart of their communities.

It's a shame when they close, but market forces, and the numbers of people actually using them, decide what is, and what isn't, a viable business proposition.

Are you selectively reading Rindi? :p

Why can't we let the market work and actually allow them to compete? There are so many restrictions on the sub-post offices they can't compete. Allow them to deal with private carriers, sell more products and services. If they're still losing loads of money after that then fair enough, but at least give it a chance.

garinda 21-03-2008 19:09

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 549743)
Are you selectively reading Rindi? :p

Why can't we let the market work and actually allow them to compete? There are so many restrictions on the sub-post offices they can't compete. Allow them to deal with private carriers, sell more products and services. If they're still losing loads of money after that then fair enough, but at least give it a chance.


No, I read all, and not selectively.

How long do you suggest we continue pouring tax payer's money down the bottomless pit, before something is done to stop it?

Do you advocate state intervention, and funding, for any other small businesses?

cashman 21-03-2008 19:11

Re: Post Office Closures
 
know what yer saying rindy,but the pit may not just have to be bottomless if other factors like competition came into play.

andrewb 21-03-2008 19:18

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 549750)
No, I read all, and not selectively.

How long do you suggest we continue pouring tax payer's money down the bottomless pit, before something is done to stop it?

Do you advocate state intervention, and funding, for any other small businesses?

I suggest we give the proposals a fair chance. If the network of sub-post offices doesn't look like its turning around its losses within a year of implementation then it's not a good sign and we should look at closures.

I'm trying to get the state out of the post office, give the postmasters a chance to be able to compete, trying to turn profits around so we don't need to fund.

Of course I agree with state regulation, which is intervention, a completely free market doesn't work. Numerous other businesses are subsidised, such as the bus and rail services.

garinda 21-03-2008 19:44

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 549762)
I suggest we give the proposals a fair chance. If the network of sub-post offices doesn't look like its turning around its losses within a year of implementation then it's not a good sign and we should look at closures.

I'm trying to get the state out of the post office, give the postmasters a chance to be able to compete, trying to turn profits around so we don't need to fund.

Of course I agree with state regulation, which is intervention, a completely free market doesn't work. Numerous other businesses are subsidised, such as the bus and rail services.

Eventually, you've told me how long you think we, the tax payer, should shoulder these losses.

Why a year?

Are you hoping by then that the Conservatives will be in power, and will then be able to say, well at least we tried (for a year,) and the inevitable closures will go ahead regardless, because people of this country have chosen to take their business elsewhere?

It's so much easier being in opposition, and not having to think about the reality of a problem, and it's long term solution.

andrewb 21-03-2008 19:51

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 549782)
Eventually, you've told me how long you think we, the tax payer, should shoulder these losses.

Why a year?

Are you hoping by then that the Conservatives will be in power, and will then be able to say, well at least we tried (for a year,) and the inevitable closures will go ahead regardless, because people of this country have chosen to take their business elsewhere?

It's so much easier being in opposition, and not having to think about the reality of a problem, and it's long term solution.

No I doubt they will be in within a year. A year because profits are released yearly, they need to know what its like all year round so that the results are not skewed by seasonal events.

I'm proposing this because I believe we should be at least making an effort. I know you think I'm doing it to gain one up on Labour, and that's the stick I'll have to take for being a member of a political party, but I simply don't see the point in dumping it, writing the other options off without trying them.

garinda 21-03-2008 19:55

Re: Post Office Closures
 
We seem to be going round in circles, so I fear we'll have to agree to disagree on this one.

Anyway I'm off to renew my car tax...on-line, but I'll leave you a little gift.

http://www.casdon.co.uk/prod_images/532lg.jpg

I want to see you've made a profit by Easter next year, otherwise I'll be shutting you down.:D

slinky 21-03-2008 19:56

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 549589)
If Cllr Jones won't answer you onlyme, i'll try to. If you don't know I'm well known for being a member of the Tory Party, and was very much involved with Council Leader Peter Britcliffe, as his campaign manager and his work in Ossy. However due to very poor health I stepped down from front line politics some seven years ago, but the lovely Graham seems to think I'm talking to PB every day, the truth is I have not seen Peter since May Day last year, and have talked to him around 5 times since then, mainly about our support of BRFC as we are both lie long fans. The bottom line is i'm not really interested politically any more, but some of the tripe spouted on her by our Graham, justs tends to turn the clock back a little. Graham thinks he is Mr. Infallible, but to my way of thinking there was only ever one person who was worthy of that title and its around 2008 years today since the Romans crucified him on Calvery. After that onlyme if you can work out where Cllr. Jones is coming from please let me know, I would find it very enlightening:confused:

Ouch!! What an unfortunate spelling mistake :D

g jones 21-03-2008 21:07

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by onlyme (Post 549691)
He may cope, but to be honest, his posts on here has changed my voting tendencies.

Probs not the way he wanted either

Democracy is about freedom of speech and freedom to choose. If other Councillors came on and the debate was opened up, I think it would make for a better Hyndburn.

I spoke with Cashman in Sydney St club and I admitted if people have Conservative views when I am out canvassing, I don't encourage them to vote for me. I tell them to vote Conservative and I have even told them why they should vote Conservative. That's just being honest and helping them represent their views. I wouldn't be able accept when I got home that someone had voted for me because I had managed to pull the wool over their eye's. That's not me.

andrewb 21-03-2008 21:18

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 549841)
That's just being honest and helping them represent their views. I wouldn't be able accept when I got home that someone had voted for me because I had managed to pull the wool over their eye's. That's not me.

I would hope the gentleman could reply to my posts on page 9 if this is the case.

WalkOnBRFC 21-03-2008 21:20

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by onlyme (Post 549691)
He may cope, but to be honest, his posts on here has changed my voting tendencies.

Probs not the way he wanted either

I am not interested in politics or who you are or not voting for and if you can change your allegiance over a few posts on a message board then I don't think Graham be either :rolleyes:

WalkOnBRFC 22-03-2008 08:18

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WalkOnBRFC (Post 549857)
I am not interested in politics or who you are or not voting for and if you can change your allegiance over a few posts on a message board then I don't think Graham be either :rolleyes:

Before the hate mail I just want to apologise to onlyme that last post was slightly b*tchy and I didn't intend for it to come across that way :)

jaysay 22-03-2008 08:31

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by slinky (Post 549785)
Ouch!! What an unfortunate spelling mistake :D

Hi slinks saw that myself but it was to late to edit, it wasn't actually a spelling mistake, its this flaming lap top, it keeps missing letters, if you look at a lot of my posts, they have reason for edit, error, it gets right up my nose sometimes:enough: :D

jaysay 22-03-2008 08:49

Re: Post Office Closures
 
[quote=g jones;549841]Democracy is about freedom of speech and freedom to choose. If other Councillors came on and the debate was opened up, I think it would make for a better Hyndburn.

I spoke with Cashman in Sydney St club and I admitted if people have Conservative views when I am out canvassing, I don't encourage them to vote for me. I tell them to vote Conservative and I have even told them why they should vote Conservative. That's just being honest and helping them represent their views. I wouldn't be

Good grief something we can agree on Graham, my sentiments entirely. I was on the knocker a few years ago and I had with me a very keen newcomer, we were in knuzden at the time. There was a house with a Labour poster in the window and this young man was walking up the path, I asked where he was going,he replied I'll try to change their minds. Shaking my head, I said anyone who has a poster in their window ain't going to change and I wouldn't even insult their intelligence by trying, besides that its just wasting our time, I only hope he learned a lesson that night. Just for the benefit of WalkonBRFC i'm not answering Grahams ost I'm agreeing with him:D

jaysay 22-03-2008 08:59

Re: Post Office Closures
 
I don't know what happened on my post 173, I was actully quoting on g.jones post 168, put it hasn't appeared like that, its just like a continuation of that post, gremlins are afoot on Accy Web :confused::confused: Maybe mods could have a look at it, strange very strange

g jones 22-03-2008 09:30

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 549436)
I would at least expect you to have some form of clue about what is going on in the world of Politics. The last general election was not even fought by Peter Britcliffe in Hyndburn.

I meant the last time Peter stood. I stand corrected. You're right.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 549436)
You seem to believe that the whole election was based on a cult of personality, he's just an ordinary man, you might want to think about policy at elections because thats usually what people care about.

I have always fought for policies. People that know me know that. Ordinary people don't tell get caught telling outright lies, call people the most offensive names, have to apologise through the courts for breaking the law deliberatly, get caught setting policies that put money in their own pocket (bus station). The list goes on.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 549436)
You bat on about these 40 uncosted items, I'd like to know what they were if we are to believe your story.

Some are finished some are not because of partnerships and complexity. We will bring them forward in good time. Many have already been rejected by the Tories such as more enforcement officers.

Our best ideas last year went straight on Tory leaflets as 'Tory ideas'. We want the Council to do well but last year people said they were voting Tory because they liked the (Labour!) ideas being put forward on Tory leaflets. It's was dishonest from a dishonest party and it won't happen again.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 549436)


It isn't however very belivable right now, because you talk about corruption, you talk about sleeze, you talk about misleading people, then you go ahead and tell us the Conservatives are raising tax by 5% when its actually 3.7%

Just shows how naive you are Cyfr. What Clr britcliffe did was merge County Council's 3% and District's 5% to say he was bringing a Council Tax of 3.7%. You have been had son. One of the oldest tricks in the books.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 549436)

Last time we had a Labour council we were £2million in debt, now we're 500k in the positive.

The debt

Tories won power in 1999. Council £11m in debt. Three years of Tories £22m in debt. December 2001 Clr B calls in City Accountants De Loitte Touche. Money going missing (not frwaud - incompetence). De Loitte Touch agree money going missing.

Robson Rhodes Council auditors annual report summary 2000, 2001, 2002 - financial incompetence.

De Loitte Touch report back may 2002 - Labour win elections. Labour Councillors told Council bankrupt - panic - can't trace the money - poor accounting. De Loitte Touche says can't afford the wages. You need to get rid of staff. Redundancy programme begins. Britcliffe blames redundancy programme for eating into Council finances. £40,000 is removed from his Litter Comission to Finance as the computer system is from the dark ages. Hyndburn ranked with Tower Hamlets, 2nd from bottom. New system put in. Britcliffe screams labour don't care about litter.

Labour decide to get rid of senior management. Uncover scale of debts. End of year debts/overspending revealed to be £2milllion a year. New management put in place. 5 year plan put together. Council financial systems shaken up.

Britcliffe opposes all these measures. Objects to his officers being got rid of.
Council turned around. Britcliffe wins election and claims it was all him.

The 500k

1. Council tax has gone up 67%. £3.5m to £5.25m.
2. Gov't grants have gone up from £5.9m to £9m excluding concessionary fares and HB. +65%
3. Council service budgets have all been slashed by 30% and told to get on with it. So there are a lot of hidden problems not on the balance sheets

Total Budget 1999 - £8.4m
Total Budget 2008 - £15.0m
Council cuts 30%

If we had been rate capped our budget would be £12m. Our debts year on year minus £3m and thats with the 30% cuts.

We are the most expensive Council in Britain. You can now see why Labour Councillors are angry. People are being ripped off with incompetence.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 549436)
Are you sure 2% increase is well costed and isn't just for votes?

Because there is no need for 500k in the bank.
"Give the people their money back, it's not yours it's their's" .... Peter Britcliffe budget attack on Labour in 2003


Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 549436)

Is it any wonder people don't trust Labour with the council when you'd be in charge?

The opposite. I saved £400,000 in one day last year when I forced officers to call in the private sector to run the line over a deal. That's one example of many. Pretty much Ian Ormerod saved the Council, not me. He is the person who people should be saying thank you too.

The Tories have lost £600,000 on a Hyndburn Life, £500,000 on Leisure Services in the last 12 months. Those are just the big ticket failure's.

We have been told our multi million loans programme is a disaster and FORCED!! to change it. I argued for a change, that it was costing Hyndburn residents a fortune, and I worked behind the scene's to expose the incompetence. I saved the authority another shed load. If I had been in charge I would have saved even more.

I saved the flats development and ensured another shed load of financial add on's was put in the deal.

The Market Hall. Its still chao's. It took 3 years for the Council to almost arrive at the right position but now I have been kicked off for being too successful in pushing policy. This is a big subject that I go on an don about Tory incompetence.

Your a very confused easily influence young man who is entitled to his opnion but whose opinions are very dangerous because they contain less than 5% of the truth.

You do not represent anyone but yourself. The ordinary person never voted for you. Weird and wacky people often in desperation claim the title of 'people's champion'. To be that Cyfr you need to go to the ballot box.

You promote idea that I am stupid, corrupt, and other slur's. Politics of desperation. Come to Peel Ward, open you eye's, I'll take you around. If your honest enough you'll take up the offer.

g jones 22-03-2008 09:44

Re: Post Office Closures
 
And I would add... I wouldn't compromise public safety by handing out Taxi Licences to convicted sex offenders. There is more to that story than can be proven absolutely.

Benipete 22-03-2008 10:01

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 547492)
Oh and lets get something straight, we currently have a £150million subsidy, which works out as a little over £2 per person a year. I don't think thats too much is it? (and thats if it was all equal, in actual fact the rich pay much more than £2 and the middle/lower classes pay less in terms of tax).

For that price I really think its worth keeping.

I agree £150 million is but a drop in the ocean,Less than a pint of lager a year,less than 10 fags,less than the amount of money lost down the back of sofas and left in taxis,far less than the amount of junk mail generated by govt.department's, probably less than the electric used in this thread and half the price of a cooked chicken:jimbo:

WalkOnBRFC 22-03-2008 10:18

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 549981)
I meant the last time Peter stood. I stand corrected. You're right.



I have always fought for policies. People that know me know that. Ordinary people don't tell get caught telling outright lies, call people the most offensive names, have to apologise through the courts for breaking the law deliberatly, get caught setting policies that put money in their own pocket (bus station). The list goes on.



Some are finished some are not because of partnerships and complexity. We will bring them forward in good time. Many have already been rejected by the Tories such as more enforcement officers.

Our best ideas last year went straight on Tory leaflets as 'Tory ideas'. We want the Council to do well but last year people said they were voting Tory because they liked the (Labour!) ideas being put forward on Tory leaflets. It's was dishonest from a dishonest party and it won't happen again.



Just shows how naive you are Cyfr. What Clr britcliffe did was merge County Council's 3% and District's 5% to say he was bringing a Council Tax of 3.7%. You have been had son. One of the oldest tricks in the books.



The debt

Tories won power in 1999. Council £11m in debt. Three years of Tories £22m in debt. December 2001 Clr B calls in City Accountants De Loitte Touche. Money going missing (not frwaud - incompetence). De Loitte Touch agree money going missing.

Robson Rhodes Council auditors annual report summary 2000, 2001, 2002 - financial incompetence.

De Loitte Touch report back may 2002 - Labour win elections. Labour Councillors told Council bankrupt - panic - can't trace the money - poor accounting. De Loitte Touche says can't afford the wages. You need to get rid of staff. Redundancy programme begins. Britcliffe blames redundancy programme for eating into Council finances. £40,000 is removed from his Litter Comission to Finance as the computer system is from the dark ages. Hyndburn ranked with Tower Hamlets, 2nd from bottom. New system put in. Britcliffe screams labour don't care about litter.

Labour decide to get rid of senior management. Uncover scale of debts. End of year debts/overspending revealed to be £2milllion a year. New management put in place. 5 year plan put together. Council financial systems shaken up.

Britcliffe opposes all these measures. Objects to his officers being got rid of.
Council turned around. Britcliffe wins election and claims it was all him.

The 500k

1. Council tax has gone up 67%. £3.5m to £5.25m.
2. Gov't grants have gone up from £5.9m to £9m excluding concessionary fares and HB. +65%
3. Council service budgets have all been slashed by 30% and told to get on with it. So there are a lot of hidden problems not on the balance sheets

Total Budget 1999 - £8.4m
Total Budget 2008 - £15.0m
Council cuts 30%

If we had been rate capped our budget would be £12m. Our debts year on year minus £3m and thats with the 30% cuts.

We are the most expensive Council in Britain. You can now see why Labour Councillors are angry. People are being ripped off with incompetence.



Because there is no need for 500k in the bank.
"Give the people their money back, it's not yours it's their's" .... Peter Britcliffe budget attack on Labour in 2003




The opposite. I saved £400,000 in one day last year when I forced officers to call in the private sector to run the line over a deal. That's one example of many. Pretty much Ian Ormerod saved the Council, not me. He is the person who people should be saying thank you too.

The Tories have lost £600,000 on a Hyndburn Life, £500,000 on Leisure Services in the last 12 months. Those are just the big ticket failure's.

We have been told our multi million loans programme is a disaster and FORCED!! to change it. I argued for a change, that it was costing Hyndburn residents a fortune, and I worked behind the scene's to expose the incompetence. I saved the authority another shed load. If I had been in charge I would have saved even more.

I saved the flats development and ensured another shed load of financial add on's was put in the deal.

The Market Hall. Its still chao's. It took 3 years for the Council to almost arrive at the right position but now I have been kicked off for being too successful in pushing policy. This is a big subject that I go on an don about Tory incompetence.

Your a very confused easily influence young man who is entitled to his opnion but whose opinions are very dangerous because they contain less than 5% of the truth.

You do not represent anyone but yourself. The ordinary person never voted for you. Weird and wacky people often in desperation claim the title of 'people's champion'. To be that Cyfr you need to go to the ballot box.

You promote idea that I am stupid, corrupt, and other slur's. Politics of desperation. Come to Peel Ward, open you eye's, I'll take you around. If your honest enough you'll take up the offer.



Blimey that's a big post :D

g jones 22-03-2008 10:21

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WalkOnBRFC (Post 550003)
Blimey that's a big post :D

I know!! :D:D:D:D:D:D:D

Didn't leave ebnough time to make breakfast!!!:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

WalkOnBRFC 22-03-2008 10:30

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 550004)
I know!! :D:D:D:D:D:D:D

Didn't leave ebnough time to make breakfast!!!:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

Hope you didn't over boil your eggs!! :rolleyes: :egged:

cashman 22-03-2008 10:32

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Well Cyfr mate i think GJ has made you a wonderful offer, ya can meet up with him n go round the ward etc etc, if you do, you will have a great oppertunity to come back here n tell the truth as you have seen it. have ya got the gumption?

jaysay 22-03-2008 11:17

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 550012)
Well Cyfr mate i think GJ has made you a wonderful offer, ya can meet up with him n go round the ward etc etc, if you do, you will have a great oppertunity to come back here n tell the truth as you have seen it. have ya got the gumption?

That is cashy if GJ only shows him what HE wants him to see:rolleyes:

katex 22-03-2008 11:22

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 550026)
That is cashy if GJ only shows him what HE wants him to see:rolleyes:

Get the feeling that Cyfr too will only see what he wants to see.

Worries me that as a student of politics he appears to be very narrow in his views and not looking at all aspects of this subject, which I would expect any student to do, then make your mind up which way you swing.

jaysay 22-03-2008 11:30

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 550004)
I know!! :D:D:D:D:D:D:D

Didn't leave ebnough time to make breakfast!!!:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

Help I'm in deep shock, send for the doctor, GJ has used a smiley, well not one but fifteen, I'm going to lay down in a dark room for the afternoon to recuperate:D:rolleyes::D

WalkOnBRFC 22-03-2008 11:33

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 550036)
Help I'm in deep shock, send for the doctor, GJ has used a smiley, well not one but fifteen, I'm going to lay down in a dark room for the afternoon to recuperate:D:rolleyes::D

Thought you were going to try to be nice that didn't last long Mr J :D

cashman 22-03-2008 11:53

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 550028)
Get the feeling that Cyfr too will only see what he wants to see.

Worries me that as a student of politics he appears to be very narrow in his views and not looking at all aspects of this subject, which I would expect any student to do, then make your mind up which way you swing.

know what ya mean kate, my view is - it will never happen! it would be nice to be wrong though in this instance.;)

onlyme 22-03-2008 11:59

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 549841)
Democracy is about freedom of speech and freedom to choose. If other Councillors came on and the debate was opened up, I think it would make for a better Hyndburn.

I spoke with Cashman in Sydney St club and I admitted if people have Conservative views when I am out canvassing, I don't encourage them to vote for me. I tell them to vote Conservative and I have even told them why they should vote Conservative. That's just being honest and helping them represent their views. I wouldn't be able accept when I got home that someone had voted for me because I had managed to pull the wool over their eye's. That's not me.


Well thats fair play. I dont class myself as strict conservative or strict labour. I try and listen to both points of view and decide which I agree with, however the post office closure is only one point, and one that doesnt really affect me personally.

What I didnt like was the way that you apeared to answer or single out one person, whether or not other people had commented. I have a vote, and so I have a voice, even if just a little one. However the above post has eliminated that somewhat

onlyme 22-03-2008 12:01

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WalkOnBRFC (Post 549967)
Before the hate mail I just want to apologise to onlyme that last post was slightly b*tchy and I didn't intend for it to come across that way :)

Lol, if you have hate mail, it hasnt originated from me. Add its undecided voters like me that are the people that need to be swayed to make a difference. Die hard party supporters will very rarely be changed

I think perhaps I am out of my depth on this post, as I dont have die hard beliefs, so i'll rid myself lol

andrewb 22-03-2008 13:49

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 549981)
Some are finished some are not because of partnerships and complexity. We will bring them forward in good time. Many have already been rejected by the Tories such as more enforcement officers.

Then if you don't even know yourself how can you set a 2% budget? I still don't know what the 40 things are never mind the costs.

Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 549981)
Just shows how naive you are Cyfr. What Clr britcliffe did was merge County Council's 3% and District's 5% to say he was bringing a Council Tax of 3.7%. You have been had son. One of the oldest tricks in the books.

So you're trying to have everyone in the borough by NOT including the county council tax rise? I think Britcliffe has done good by including it, it shows the full cost people will be paying, no hidden taxes.

I can't argue with the whole history, I haven't been apart of the council to counter argue or even know if you're telling the whole story, but you seem to claim the council is incompetent, yet they're rated excellent by an independent board.

Additionally, you mention spending the £500k in order to fund your low tax, well thats just the complete wrong way about it. Save when the times are good, to use when the times are not so good. The times could get much worse than they are now economically, don't be so irresponsible.


Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones (Post 549981)
Your a very confused easily influence young man who is entitled to his opinion but whose opinions are very dangerous because they contain less than 5% of the truth.

You do not represent anyone but yourself. The ordinary person never voted for you. Weird and wacky people often in desperation claim the title of 'people's champion'. To be that Cyfr you need to go to the ballot box.

You promote idea that I am stupid, corrupt, and other slur's. Politics of desperation. Come to Peel Ward, open you eye's, I'll take you around. If your honest enough you'll take up the offer.

That’s an interesting proposition, may I ask what would be the purpose of going around Peel Ward?

blazey 22-03-2008 14:10

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 550084)
Then if you don't even know yourself how can you set a 2% budget? I still don't know what the 40 things are never mind the costs.



So you're trying to have everyone in the borough by NOT including the county council tax rise? I think Britcliffe has done good by including it, it shows the full cost people will be paying, no hidden taxes.

I can't argue with the whole history, I haven't been apart of the council to counter argue or even know if you're telling the whole story, but you seem to claim the council is incompetent, yet they're rated excellent by an independent board.

Additionally, you mention spending the £500k in order to fund your low tax, well thats just the complete wrong way about it. Save when the times are good, to use when the times are not so good. The times could get much worse than they are now economically, don't be so irresponsible.




That’s an interesting proposition, may I ask what would be the purpose of going around Peel Ward?

You're getting as bad as him with your OTT posting.

Again the politicians of the forum alienate everyone with their own little tiff. So often you both talk about changing politics and letting people stand by their political beliefs and yet you fight so strongly to win us.

You're both as bad as each other :rolleyes:

andrewb 22-03-2008 14:14

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 550028)
Get the feeling that Cyfr too will only see what he wants to see.

Worries me that as a student of politics he appears to be very narrow in his views and not looking at all aspects of this subject, which I would expect any student to do, then make your mind up which way you swing.

What issues am I not addressing? Where exactly have I been narrow minded, other than having an opinion after looking at the matter?

andrewb 22-03-2008 14:15

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by blazey (Post 550120)
You're getting as bad as him with your OTT posting.

Again the politicians of the forum alienate everyone with their own little tiff. So often you both talk about changing politics and letting people stand by their political beliefs and yet you fight so strongly to win us.

You're both as bad as each other :rolleyes:

I didn't think three short paragraphs and two one liners was too much, I tried to cut it down as much as possible but wasn't exactly easy given the post I had to reply to.

blazey 22-03-2008 14:22

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 550127)
I didn't think three short paragraphs and two one liners was too much, I tried to cut it down as much as possible but wasn't exactly easy given the post I had to reply to.

Why do you have to reply to him though? Surely the public ignore Labour MP's all the time, otherwise why would they vote for them? It's not like they ever tell the truth about anything :rolleyes:

cashman 22-03-2008 14:24

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by blazey (Post 550133)
Why do you have to reply to him though? Surely the public ignore Labour MP's all the time, otherwise why would they vote for them? It's not like they ever tell the truth about anything :rolleyes:

cos the offer was made to him, its called "Good Form":rolleyes:

blazey 22-03-2008 14:28

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 550136)
cos the offer was made to him, its called "Good Form":rolleyes:

I think Cyfr takes everything to heart an his biggest weakness is showing that he cares too much about what he believes. Letting his guard down really, and like Katex, I agree that he is a bit too small minded sometimes to step away from Conservative ideology and look at it from a realistic point of view.

The Conservatives are saying keep open the Post Offices so they win votes, not because it's the correct decision economically. He's saying sell stuff in post offices and yet most do an they're still shutting down. I just don't think its the answer and so I am happy to go against my Tory side and be realistic.

jaysay 22-03-2008 14:34

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WalkOnBRFC (Post 550039)
Thought you were going to try to be nice that didn't last long Mr J :D

You want to get out more Walkon if you think thats being nasty, I just thought it was funny seeing GJ use smilies, can't remember seeing it before:rolleyes::D

jaysay 22-03-2008 14:36

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by onlyme (Post 550053)
Lol, if you have hate mail, it hasnt originated from me. Add its undecided voters like me that are the people that need to be swayed to make a difference. Die hard party supporters will very rarely be changed

I think perhaps I am out of my depth on this post, as I dont have die hard beliefs, so i'll rid myself lol

Me neither onlyme:D:D:D

g jones 22-03-2008 17:51

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 550084)
Then if you don't even know yourself how can you set a 2% budget? I still don't know what the 40 things are never mind the costs.

Like I said. The Government gave us £4m extra. This is outside the Council Tax.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 550084)
So you're trying to have everyone in the borough by NOT including the county council tax rise? I think Britcliffe has done good by including it, it shows the full cost people will be paying, no hidden taxes.

Yes there is a headline figure, 3.7%. In previous years County set a 5% and District 4%. Clr Britclffe used the District 4% figure and blamed County for it being higher.

Secondly. Clr Britcliffe calls County 'the evil empire'. Inefficient etc... Strange situation!?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 550084)
I can't argue with the whole history, I haven't been apart of the council to counter argue or even know if you're telling the whole story, but you seem to claim the council is incompetent, yet they're rated excellent by an independent board.

Additionally, you mention spending the £500k in order to fund your low tax, well thats just the complete wrong way about it. Save when the times are good, to use when the times are not so good. The times could get much worse than they are now economically, don't be so irresponsible.

The Audit Commision rated the book keeping only, not policies. This excellent would not have happened without Ian Ormerod. Clr Britcliffe opposed all the changes to management so therefore is not in a position to claim much credit. In front of the Audit Commission it as a different story, (when he bought top champagne out of the Council tax to quaff) he said it was Labour and Tory working together. In the press and on his leaflets its now just Tory and Labour got us in the mess.

The Audit Commision did not look at policies or effectiveness. However Clr Britcliffe is now implying to people we are 1) an excellent Council with excellent policies 2) It's all down to him.

We have £1.8m in the bank. This was to bank a further 500k. The advice to the Tories is to keep 5% of budget banked for a rainy day (750k). The reason for this is we are taxing the local economy too heavily. We are now the most expensive Council in Britain with 8.1% of incomes going on Council Tax. When I put the 2% I said 5% was Tax Tax Tax for no reason.

The reason the reserves were empty was a serious of disastrous policies between 1999-2002 as highlighted by auditors and city analysts called in by Clr Britcliffe.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyfr (Post 550084)
That’s an interesting proposition, may I ask what would be the purpose of going around Peel Ward?

You said/implied I was a bad Councillor who needed to be defeated. I would like to show the problems. How much hard work I have done to put them right. Any direction, any problem, you choose.

We will then go to a residents meeting and you can read out those words you said about me to voters in Peel. That way you have had the best chance to further your own cause and criticisms.

WalkOnBRFC 22-03-2008 18:28

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 550153)
You want to get out more Walkon if you think thats being nasty, I just thought it was funny seeing GJ use smilies, can't remember seeing it before:rolleyes::D

It was in jest I wasn't trying to be sarcastic :(

WalkOnBRFC 22-03-2008 18:32

Re: Post Office Closures
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 550157)
Me neither onlyme:D:D:D

Nor have I had any hate mail it was a figure of speech


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:21.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com