Re: Are the beatles still as relevant as their heyday?
 

Nut Rocker.

Re: Are the beatles still as relevant as their heyday?
 

I thought it was Bohemian Rhapsody - Queen :confused:
but then I'm not a classical fan - could be wrong

Re: Are the beatles still as relevant as their heyday?
 

I know,He's on tour.

Re: Are the beatles still as relevant as their heyday?
 

The Beatles retired from touring four years before they broke up.
I like that The Beatles weren't resurrected at any point. For me, a big Beatles fan, it further encapsulates the enigma that is them and their music.
Like, I love The Who's music, but they should've broke up when Moon died and even more so when John Entwistle died a few years ago. The tour de force that was The Who is now two weak old blokes who are losing their credibility because there's no decent new material.
Likewise I believe The 'Stones should've given it up long ago because now they're just doing it for the money. I lost all respect for the Stones when they claimed all the royalties for The Verve's 'Bittersweet Symphony' back in the nineties. Money driven fools. They sold out completely :(

Re: Are the beatles still as relevant as their heyday?
 

Once the next generation get into media and journalism management and positions of "power" and no longer have to put up with the early on-set alziemers reminiscences of aging baby boomers the hype about the Beatles and all the other 60s stuff will eventually just fade away and then the 60s sound will just be nostalgia, something featured on "all our yesterdays" like the big band sound listened to by earlier generations .

Re: Are the beatles still as relevant as their heyday?
 

Oh yes, I remember that. I think poor old Peter Ilyich might have been revolving in his grave - especially as he didn't get any royalties. :D

Re: Are the beatles still as relevant as their heyday?
 

well i was reading abotu rolling stone magazine and how it was critized for placing too much emphasis on the 60's70's stuff in their top 100 singles ever and the mag was generally aiming for that kinda music rather than lookin at music as a whole. it completely missed the launch of hip hop and heavy metal in its early yrs and it has re-reviewed alot of the early stuff inorder to balance it.

that i think is one of the biggest signs that slowly its all gonna b moving on and eventually ppl will talk of the white stripes etc just as much and give them their due

Re: Are the beatles still as relevant as their heyday?
 

The point being He is still remembered 115yrs after he died and who's to say the Beatles won't.Certainly sold more records.(Pyotr) by the way.:D

Re: Are the beatles still as relevant as their heyday?
 

the rolling stone probably missed the start of hip-hop etc deliberatly.:D

Re: Are the beatles still as relevant as their heyday?
 

I missed it too - must have blinked

Re: Are the beatles still as relevant as their heyday?
 

Who are The Beatles :cool::D

Re: Are the beatles still as relevant as their heyday?
 

I saw the Beatles at King Georges, along with Gerry and the Pace Makers Cilla who were suppor artists to the late great Roy Orbison (as cashy reminded me in the music section the other week) what did I think of the Beatles live back then, absolute unadulterated CRAP. That still did not stop me from becoming a huge fan and have every L.P. they ever made, and most of them now on CD.

Re: Are the beatles still as relevant as their heyday?
 

You're right of course but i would have been kinder and said they were not very good.But they learned their trade as we all do and became the legends of pop that they are.I also have all their LP's.

Re: Are the beatles still as relevant as their heyday?
 

I think benipete is referring to the original drummer Pete Best, rather than his usurper.
;)

Re: Are the beatles still as relevant as their heyday?
 

Pete Best isn't dead either it was Stuart Sutcliffe that died at a very early age.