![]() |
Re: Lost For Words.
well said, good post jim.
|
Re: Lost For Words.
Quote:
Thanks also for the nice Karma. |
Re: Lost For Words.
Quote:
|
Re: Lost For Words.
Quote:
The eight-page bail order specifies that Qatada will be barred from associating with certain people, including Osama bin Laden and hate preacher Abu Hamza. The list of Qatada's banned associates also includes bin Laden's deputy Ayman al-Zawahiri and Rachid Ramda, who has been convicted in France of masterminding a series of bombings in 1995. Unusually, the document bans Qatada from attending "any mosque". Qatada is also prevented from leading prayers, giving lectures or "providing religious instruction" to anyone except his wife and children. Recommend this article |
Re: Lost For Words.
Quote:
So the security forces will have a person parked at his front and back door 24/7 to make sure that he doesn’t go out when he shouldn’t and banned people do not come to visit him, won’t they? When he does go out legitimately surely there will be a surveillance team following him, to ensure that he adheres to the bail order, won’t there? Of course there will have to be a tap on his phone so that ties up a few more people. Will anyone coming out be searched for letters from Abu? Will they be followed? And there will have to be a team monitoring his Internet activity. All in all I can see this bail order costing a small fortune and just as importantly tying up many operatives who could be employed on other projects. |
Re: Lost For Words.
I believe they are taking 4 operatives off unit 4 securities crack tortoise rounding up team.
|
Re: Lost For Words.
Oh well he is wearing a tag and his mobile phone will be logged I feel so much safer knowing that. The tag can be removed and he no doubt has mobile phones that the police don't know about. We read so many people moaning about how inadequate the police are and yet it is ok to let them make sure this man doesn't break his bail conditions. I for one think he should be in prison, he is a threat to our security
|
Re: Lost For Words.
I am a bit confused....this guy has been in prison for 6 years without any charges? so why do the weeping hearts ( David Davies for example ) start crying and resign over suspects being detained for 42 day's without charge ?... the Tory party were shouting and balling about "human rights" a few day's ago.. were are they now ?
Also I don't really understand what this case has to do with the EU ? |
Re: Lost For Words.
Just to highlight this a quote;
Abu Qatada's case makes a mockery of the 42-day detention debate. He spent six years behind bars without being charged. Last week, in his resignation statement, the former Tory shadow home secretary David Davis rightly described the 42-day pre-charge detention period for terror suspects that parliament had just authorised as "a monstrosity of a law". full stuff from here.. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...islam.religion Now this article may have certain political leanings, but it does point out the total farce of the Tory and Liberal opposition to the 42 day rule. |
Re: Lost For Words.
don't worry mancie, cyfr will probably be along to explain to you.:rolleyes:
|
Re: Lost For Words.
Quote:
|
Re: Lost For Words.
Once again the law is proven to be an ass.
I'd be more than happy if he was detained indefinitely, if that wouldn't be seen as too expensive. Better still deport him to Jordan. |
Re: Lost For Words.
Quote:
|
Re: Lost For Words.
Now Now... we should go to the "dairy room" to slag bods off!
|
Re: Lost For Words.
It now appears that it will cost us £500,000 a year to protect this scumbag, plus what it will cost to keep him and his brood in the lifestyle they're become accustom to, and this is a guy that hates anything british, but apparently not our money, I'd gladly chip in for a one-way ticket back to Jordon for him and his tribe:(
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:19. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com