Re: No Fostering.
 

Would presume all comes out of the expenses they are given to look after this child Neil .. she didn't say.

Could obviously, ask them not to smoke in the house and ban them to the outside, but were not allowed to take their cigarettes off them. Remember is an addiction and would be a danger of them stealing if they were not accommodated in some way.

Love the typing error by the way ... very appropriate ... :D

Re: No Fostering.
 

I prefer to use the term wage not expenses.

That was an accident.

Re: No Fostering.
 

You've said that before about something else but I can't remember what it was now. :(

I'll probably forget this one too by the time I see you.:rolleyes:

I'll have to start making a list.

Re: No Fostering.
 

Just a little of track, but don't some people make fostering a job of work caring for these kids, and if so would this not be breaking the law of smoking at work, or am I just being pedantic:rolleyes:

Re: No Fostering.
 

That is an interesting point. Yes they get paid for fostering, several hundred pounds a week if you have a teenager with problems. Is this classed as income? If so the earning of income could be classed as work.

Re: No Fostering.
 

Oh dear - it is after reading this thread that i have remembered why I dont post much on here anymore .

Re: No Fostering.
 

I don't know what you mean by that.....what have we said? :confused:

Re: No Fostering.
 

I'm just glad none of you had to live through it .

Re: No Fostering.
 

You mention that you were fostered.

Would it have made a difference to you if your foster parents were smokers or non smokers?

Re: No Fostering.
 

Oh nothing Lilly - Its just that every damn thread seems to turn into a petty - lets see who I can catch out this time, snidey comeback thread why cant people acccept everyone has an opinion fair enough it may not always be right IN SOMEBODY ELSES EYES but its life we all have opinions - so im not offended just fedup of the bickering thats all.

Re: No Fostering.
 

So you thought you'd add to it by being negative.:confused:

Everyone's opinion is as valid as the next person's on here.

I really don't see a problem, and certainly not one in this thread.

As for my own thoughts on the matter, given that there are documented health risks from passive smoking, I can quite see the logic of children not being placed in homes where the foster parents, or carers, are smokers.

Re: No Fostering.
 

i wasnt really talking about the issue the thread is about - more that there was bickering on the first page which neednt have been there, yet seems to be working its way into more and more threads- but yes I had added to the negativity i suppose - more fool me

Re: No Fostering.
 

I'm not having a go, I just can't see any evidence of bickering in this thread, just differences of opinions, which is quite normal, not just on here, but in everyday life too.

It would be a boring old world if we all thought exactly the same way about everything.

To rid any negativity from the air, have some positive karma instead.:)

Re: No Fostering.
 

lol gee thanks :D

Re: No Fostering.
 

No.That was the least of the problems.:mad: