![]() |
Re: Are I.D. cards a good thing?
It's in the Daily Mirror today 25th 11 05 page 9 Apparently Prime Minister Tony Blair was bugged by USA security forces and files kept on him. The USA want to put in legislation in that states visitors won't be able to enter the country unless the Security people have access to their e-mails to check if they have been in contact with anyone undesirable. So all these things are being put into place - regardless of what people like you and me think.
Garinda, what difference would it have made if my brother'd had an I.D. card? None, unless of course it was at the stage where people are tracked on a daily basis! As far as Iraq is concerned British Government armed and backed Saddam Husein into power as the USA backed Al Queda in Afghanistan back in the 80's! Know your history not just what it says on the news!:hehetable |
Re: Are I.D. cards a good thing?
Quote:
|
Re: Are I.D. cards a good thing?
Quote:
|
Re: Are I.D. cards a good thing?
Quote:
Let me see if I have this spot on. Your post #75 states: “Benefit fraud (and error) costs us £2.6 billion according to recent statistics.” It’s the word “and” even inside brackets that gives it away. It lumps fraud and error together. If you are going to argue your case then at least have the common sense to argue facts as they are and not try to spin your way out. But then that is what politicians, even budding ones, do. |
Re: Are I.D. cards a good thing?
Are you disagreeing that it will take at least 150 years to pay back or not? The only difference error would make would be to extend the 150 years, and further reinforce my point.
Are you working this out, or just taking the view on a principled stand that I lumped them together therefore I cannot have an exact figure? If it's the latter then you haven't taken the effort to realise I have used the most conservative figures, and yet it still backs up what I said. |
Re: Are I.D. cards a good thing?
Quote:
Lumping two statistics under one umbrella is always suspicious and makes me wonder what is being hidden. In this case you stated that it costs us £2.6 billion in benefit fraud and errors. All I wanted to know is how much was down to fraud and how much was down to errors. Let us suppose that £2 billion was down to error and only £0.6 to fraud. That wouldn’t give the pro ID cards brigade a case to back up their pro ID arguments seeing as the bulk of it is based on anti fraud, would it? But it would give the anti ID lot ammunition to accuse the government of incompetence in their departments. Now I’m not going to argue this point with you any more. I’ve made my position clear. |
Re: Are I.D. cards a good thing?
:sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep:
|
Re: Are I.D. cards a good thing?
Quote:
I dont find Gordon Brown particularly desirable, did he get into trouble? |
Re: Are I.D. cards a good thing?
Quote:
|
Re: Are I.D. cards a good thing?
Quote:
The only silly bit is your response to a suggestion what COULD happen. |
Re: Are I.D. cards a good thing?
Quote:
If the police can collect and store DNA then anyone can!:confused::confused: |
Re: Are I.D. cards a good thing?
If you've already got a Passport, i dont think you should also need to have an ID card as well. If they are going to be made compulsory at some point, this should only be for people who dont have or dont want a passport.
Best Regards - Taggy |
Re: Are I.D. cards a good thing?
Quote:
|
Re: Are I.D. cards a good thing?
Ive got one....so dont feel that i should need an ID card too!!!
Best Regards - Taggy |
Re: Are I.D. cards a good thing?
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:49. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com