![]() |
Re: Lordy Lordy
This may well be the death knell for the House of Lords
...and not before time:rolleyes: |
Re: Lordy Lordy
Quote:
|
Re: Lordy Lordy
Quote:
|
Re: Lordy Lordy
Not only did Prudence Brown sell off our gold reserves at a rock bottom price, anyone with a company pension will never forgive him for pillaging their pension funds in order to facilitate his benefits give away to the sick, lame and lazy. I reckon the government should follow America's example of limiting child benefit to two children. That would surely save the hard pressed taxpayer a bundle and stop the 'benefits breeders' in their tracks.
:stop::behead::bingobang |
Re: Lordy Lordy
Don't think it is fair to pre-judge this situation just yet Jaysay ... if it is proved then we will all have a go at sticking the needles in ... :D
|
Re: Lordy Lordy
Quote:
|
Re: Lordy Lordy
Quote:
|
Re: Lordy Lordy
Quote:
|
Re: Lordy Lordy
Quote:
Whether or not these four Lords are found to have broken the rules, Lord Taylor of Blackburn in his recent interviews since the Sunday Times published their findings after their investigation, showed scant regard for the matter, no humility, or indeed any doubt that he'd done anything at all wrong. His manner and thinking would have lesser beings safely locked in a secure home somewhere, rather than sitting in the House of Lords, taking bungs. |
Re: Lordy Lordy
as margaret said earlier, the lords should be done away with,jobs fer the boys has never cut it with me.:cool: if a second house is needed it should be an elected one that works fer legislation, NOT sleeps through it or takes backhanders like some of these owd *******.
|
Re: Lordy Lordy
Quote:
Labour's half hearted attempt at reforming the Lords has failed in my book, and sadly none of the other parties have made known any of their intentions to sort out this outdated relic of an institution. |
Re: Lordy Lordy
Quote:
|
Re: Lordy Lordy
It has now emerged that Lord Taylor claimed £400,000 in expenses from 2001 to 2008 that is for travel, meals and accommodation, that's over £50,000 a year, and they say they don't get paid in the upper house, in the immortal words of Yosser Hughes, "give us a job, I could do that":D
|
Re: Lordy Lordy
The Lords is a long story, but I think we need to keep it. It is a good scrutiny body, which we need. Having an elected upper house would make it rather pointless unless we move in the American direction. The thing about the Lords is they can do and say things without needing to think about re-election, which makes it particularly good at scrutiny despite having no real powers.
Obviously these people who abuse the system should be dealt with, as they make the ones who are hard working look bad. Same with MP's. |
Re: Lordy Lordy
then please explain how "Jobs fer the Boys" as is now, is preferable to n elected body? seems to me they get in now by arse-licking n towing someones line.:confused:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:48. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com