![]() |
Re: SmearGate
i think the difference between us andrew is i was educated to never take owt at face value, no matter who was saying it, if i was interested in summat then to dig, dig, look at all opinions, then make me own mind up, you seem to me,to jump on yer party bandwagon immediately n accept whatever they say, that i find pathetic.:rolleyes: its called reserving judgement.
|
Re: SmearGate
Quote:
|
Re: SmearGate
Quote:
|
Re: SmearGate
Quote:
|
Re: SmearGate
Quote:
|
Re: SmearGate
Quote:
Let's not beat around the bush, in this case Derek Draper and Damian McBride had every intention of setting up a blog to publish these smears. The only person suggesting it was attained by hacking was Derek Draper, proven to lie as long as it saves his own skin. Even if it was, it's out there now in context of smears rather than the vicious rumours they were going to spread. Refusing to comment on the content, makes me wonder if you would react the same if the story was about the Conservatives. :rolleyes: Fair enough if you believe it was hacked, but why are you not commenting on the rest? |
Re: SmearGate
Quote:
|
Re: SmearGate
Quote:
|
Re: SmearGate
Quote:
|
Re: SmearGate
Quote:
|
Re: SmearGate
Quote:
|
Re: SmearGate
I think the real question that should be asked amid all these shenanigans is whether or not Kate Garraway will be looking for a new fella :D
|
Re: SmearGate
Sleaziod politicians complaing about morality and good taste :rofl38: :rofl38: pots and kettles :D :D
|
Re: SmearGate
Quote:
|
Re: SmearGate
Quote:
He maybe busy, I know he has a social life (unlike some on here!) Why are you so pathetically bothered about what he is doing and where he is? Makes you look a little bit like a stalker......:rolleyes: |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:43. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com