![]() |
Re: MP expenses - Our Greg's
Well, most companies will allow employees working away from home to claim for food either on an actual expense or on a per diem basis. The interesting question - given that all MP's appear to have claimed lump sum food expenses - is why were those country MP's who flipped their main home to London allowed to claim?
|
Re: MP expenses - Our Greg's
Quote:
|
Re: MP expenses - Our Greg's
I agree with you Jaysay....I'm just trying to get inside an MP's head to work out how they justified what they did. Anyway, looks like Usher is also quitting as an MP...."in order to spend more time with her family". You would have thought that by now one of 'em would have come up with a different excuse for going. Wouldn't it be refreshing for one of 'em to just own up and say "I'm quitting because I'm guilty of thieving from the taxpayer".
|
Re: MP expenses - Our Greg's
Quote:
I have no beef with anyone claiming justified expenses, whilst carrying out the work of public office, though it should be open to public scrutiny, and those expenses should be set by an independent body. Which they were in the case of H.B.C., but were then superciliously ignored by the ruling council group. |
Re: MP expenses - Our Greg's
Why do MP's need to spend so much time in London in this media savvy, technological age?? Surely most of their "London business" could be done in a couple of days per week. Most of their time should be spent in their consituencies, doing the work they've been elected for. There would be no need whatsoever then for second homes, and a more "normal" expenses system could be set up, as in the business community. Parliament needs a radical reform to reflect the times and the abilities of being able to effectively communicate and debate without the need for people to be all in the same location. All MP's should live in their constituencies for at least their parliamentory lives. The main effect that spending so much time in London seems to have had on our MP's, is that they are concentrating more on issue's that are of benefit to themselves and their individual party rather than of the people who made it possible for them to be there!
Best Regards - Taggy |
Re: MP expenses - Our Greg's
Quote:
|
Re: MP expenses - Our Greg's
Quote:
|
Re: MP expenses - Our Greg's
Quote:
|
Re: MP expenses - Our Greg's
Quote:
The most amusing, if it wasn't so sickening, of the recent half publications of expenses, surely has to be from George Osborne, the Conservative Shadow Chancellor. 'A trawl through the receipts published today revealed that the shadow chancellor, George Osborne, claimed £47 for two copies of a DVD of his own speech on value for taxpayers' money in 2005.' David Cameron to repay wrongly claimed expenses | Politics | guardian.co.uk |
Re: MP expenses - Our Greg's
Quote:
|
Re: MP expenses - Our Greg's
Quote:
Surely we should expect highly principled politicans locally, just as we do nationally? Otherwise it would be easy to label someone guilty of gross hypocrisy. |
Re: MP expenses - Our Greg's
Quote:
|
Re: MP expenses - Our Greg's
The bad news is that the pay review body yesterday reported that MP's were underpaid by 10-15% and that a pay rise of this magnitude would now be in order.
The good news is that come the election, few of the buggars will be around to receive it. |
Re: MP expenses - Our Greg's
Quote:
A £10,000 rise is in the offing, so its a case of screw the system and get a huge big increase, this just don't happen in the real world only on Planet Westminster:( |
Re: MP expenses - Our Greg's
Quote:
Or is the 20% increase in our council leader's allowances, which some councillors voted to award him, too much to comprehend? Expenses rise sparks fury in council chamber - News - Accrington Observer |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:37. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com